Monthly Archives: June 2012

Kalam not being truthful on Sonia-as-PM episode, says Swamy

Hong Kong: Janata Party leader Subramanian Swamy said on Saturday that former President APJ Abdul Kalam was “not being truthful to history” in claiming, as he does in his memoirs, that he had been ready in 2004 to appoint Congress leader Sonia Gandhi as Prime Minister, overruling political opposition that cited Sonia Gandhi‘s foreign origins.

In an interview to Firstpost in Hong Kong on the sidelines of a World Hindu Economic Forum, Swamy said that Kalam should release the letter that (Swamy claims) Kalam wrote to Sonia Gandhi at 3.30 pm on 17 May 2004, which would establish that Kalam had indicated to Sonia Gandhi that her claim to prime ministership would not be honoured.

Abdul Kalam would enhance his credibility “if he published the letter he wrote to Sonia Gandhi at 3.30 pm,” Swamy said. There were two other eyewitnesses to the fact that a letter did go out to Sonia Gandhi, Swamy said.

Janata Party leader Subramanian Swamy. PTI

(Swamy has earlier claimed that both Manmohan Singh and Natwar Singh knew of the letter, and he confirmed that again today.)

Swamy’s dare comes in response to claims that Kalam made in his memoirs that he had prepared a letter appointing Sonia Gandhi as Prime Minister, despite political opposition to such a move, from Swamy and others. Kalam also notes in his memoirs that when Sonia Gandhi and Manmohan Singh came to Rashtrapati Bhavan, Sonia Gandhi surprised him (Kalam) by saying that she was appointing Manmohan Singh for the Prime Minister’s post. The appointment letter from Rashtrapati Bhavan, which initially had Sonia Gandhi’s name for Prime Ministership, had to be changed, Kalam notes in his memoirs. (More on that here.)

That version of events has now been challenged by Swamy, who says he met Kalam at 12.30 on that afternoon to point out that there were legal obstacles to appointing Sonia Gandhi as Prime Minister.

“I had met (Kalam) at 12.30 pm and explained to him that there is a legal bar,” Swamy toldFirstpost. “Subsequently, I learnt that there was a letter written by him cancelling his appointment with Sonia Gandhi for 5 pm” — at which Sonia Gandhi was to have staked her claim to the Prime Ministership on the basis of supporting letters from alliance parties.

“If Mr Abdul Kalam doesn’t publish that letter, I would think that he is not being truthful to history,” Swamy said.

Swamy has indicated earlier that Kalam had invited him to Rashtrapati Bhavan to explain to him and to other officials the nature of the legal obstacles that Sonia Gandhi’s appointment would face — since, in Swamy’s opinion, her Indian citizenship (by registration) was flawed since she had not renounced her Italian citizenship.

Swamy has further claimed that when he was at Rashtrapati Bhavan, he even came across a letter from Sonia Gandhi to President Kalam supporting her own nomination for prime ministership (more here). (He cites this to challenge the dominant Congress narrative that Sonia Gandhi was never interested in the top job.)

When Firstpost asked Swamy if he was standing by his assertion that Kalam had been persuaded not to appoint Sonia Gandhi as Prime Minister, he said emphatically: “Yes, I know it for a fact that a letter was written… That letter is on record.”

In response to another question, Swamy said he could not explain why Kalam was today offering an alternative version of the narrative that challenged Swamy’s. Asked if Kalam’s claim should be seen in the light of the aborted attempt to nominate him for a second term as President, perhaps with the support of the Congress, Swamy declined to speculate. “The more important question is: why is he saying what he is saying now,” he added.

Asked if he was disappointed at having pitched for a second term for Kalam as President (in the light of the revelations in Kalam’s memoirs, which challenge Swamy’s version of the events), Swamy said he had no regrets at all, “I still believe he would have made a very good candidate.” Perhaps there were other circumstances that he didn’t know about that might account for Kalam’s change in the narrative, Swamy added.

“I will never support a foreigner to be the Prime Minister or President of India. I am firm on my stand.” – Sangma

Presidential hopeful PA Sangma rakes up Sonia Gandhi’s foreign origin again

New Delhi: Presidential hopeful and former Lok Sabha Speaker PA Sangma has once again raised the issue of Congress President’s Sonia Gandhi’s foreign issue. Sangma launched his diatribe in Guwahati on Saturday following former president APJ Abdul Kalam’s revelation that he (Kalam) could not have blocked Sonia’s elevation as the Prime Minister after the Congress-led United Progressive Alliance (UPA) won the Lok Sabha elections in 2004 had she wanted to.

Sangma, who broke away from the Congress along with Sharad Pawar and Tariq Anwar on Sonia’s foreign issue in 1999 to form the Nationalist Congress Party (NCP), said, “It was my personal view, that is my view now also and it will be my view in the future till I die. I will never support a foreigner to be the Prime Minister or President of India. I am firm on my stand.”

The former Lok Sabha Speaker was forced to quit the NCP, a key ally of the Congress, due to his insistence on contesting the Presidential election despite the UPA nominating Pranab Mukherjee as it candidate.

Sangma’s tirade comes after former president APJ Abdul Kalam in his book ‘Turning Points, A Journey Through Challenges’ stoked a political fire by revealing that if Sonia had so desired then he would have had no choice but to appoint her as the Prime Minister of India.

Harsh Mander links with Ghulam Nabi Fai, ISI, SoniaG, NAC members gallery

NOTE: NAC is a mechanism used by SoniaG to destroy the institution of Union Cabinet. As Chairperson of NAC, SoniaG gets ‘cabinet rank’.

NAC’s Harsh Mander’s link with Pakistan’s ISI [Ghulam Nabi Fai “interface”]

The Mainstream Media [MSM] in India has, as of 27th August 2011, been on a spree of unrelenting, unceasing coverage of a fast undertaken by a gentleman named Anna Hazare. For the past 12-odd days, beamed through the airways into our living rooms is a macabre spectacle of a septuagenarian man killing himself slowly via a self-imposed starvation, egged on by a cheering crowd of ~15000 [generous] around him. Doctors, who have taken an oath to ensure their patient’s good health & well-being, look-on without acting against it, even as his health deteriorates.

Television viewer in India has been trippin’ on this heady concoction of death-threats, rage, blackmailing, infused with the hyperbole-induced melodramatic narration by television news reporters, anchors & ably assisted by “experts” invited by the channels. However, in midst of this melee, one crucial, & potentially damaging bit of news has found absolutely no coverage at all in any form of media.

On the 15th of August this year, ironically the day India celebrates as Independence Day, a forummember pointed out to an association that should have [or, has already had] serious, debilitating impact on the governance of the country. A gentleman, named Harsh Mander [on the left], who is currently on the board of members of a national body, ostensibly named India’s “National Advisory Council” [NAC] was found to be on the working group of an organisation that called itself theJustice Foundation. His name, as can be seen, has been listed on the organisation’s website. This particular Working Group, as they’ve called it, had been set up in relation to the Indian state of Jammu & Kashmir.

Now, the reason Harsh Mander’s association with this Justice Foundation is a potential breach of security at the upper echelons of India’s power structure, & compromises the credibility & integrity of the NAC is because the organisation has been found to be run by an American, named Ghulam Nabi Fai. The person [Fai] has since been arrested by the American authorities, though now out on bail, for acting on behalf of Pakistan’s intelligence agency, the Inter Services Intelligence [ISI], taking orders from them to further its agenda in America, in a manner that contravenes U.S. laws.

Kashmir Background

As would be known to those who keep tab on events occurring in the Indian sub-continent, the Islamic Republic of Pakistan lays claim on the Indian state of Jammu & Kashmir & is in illegal occupation of nearly 1/3rd of the state, in violation of a United Nations resolution passed in 1948. In pursuance of their agenda of dismembering India & integrating the state within its fold, Pakistan, or more specifically its de-factor rulers, the Pakistan Army, for many decades, has engaged in an uninterrupted act of sponsoring Islamic terrorism to carry out attacks & killing of population in India. In the same vein, it has funded & started front organisations, like the aforementioned Justice Foundation, around the world to push for the acceptance of its stand & try to use the influence of the government of the host country they are based in, to coerce the Republic of India into acquiescing to Pakistani demands, however illegitimate they are.

While elaborating on the illegitimacy of Pakistani demands would entail digressing from the issue I want to highlight, it should be sufficient to state, India is completely opposed to these Pakistani demands. Keeping this Indian stand in mind, it would not be wrong to expect that all Indians, especially those involved in the policy-making of the country, act towards the furtherance of this stand & refrain from any activity that hurts India’s national interests.

Yet, in complete contravention of these expectations, Harsh Mander has willingly been party to an organisation, the Justice Foundation, run by people [Ghulam Nabi Fai (to the right) & his associates, Nazir A. Shawl], long known to Indian intelligence agencies & foreign ministry staffersof the country to be the front-men of Pakistani ISI. It is, therefore, pertinent to ask of Mr. Mander, as to why he chose to associate his name & work with an organisation that has been specifically setup by Pakistan to kowtow & propagate the Pakistani line & push for casting India falsely in light of an antagonistic intransigent belligerent, completely whitewashing Pakistan’s own grave violations & machinations towards effecting death & destruction in India, especially Jammu & Kashmir, to achieve its motives. Any Indian reactionary measures & associated misdeeds, inadvertent most of them may be, is simply a result of the aftermath to this Pakistani ingress into India’s affairs.

Surely a person as capable as Mr. Harsh Mander who, at one time, was a Civil Service officer in India, a highly respected government official, that only the very bright in India can aspire to become, could not have been blind to their agenda. Also the fact that Mr. Ghulam Nabi Fai, a known Pakistan serf was the one running the show, would itself have precluded any well-meaning Indian from taking part in any of its activities, that works towards legitimizing & promoting the Pakistani stand & actions & discrediting the Indian one. Despite such glaring indicators, the fact that Mr. Mander willingly associated himself with a Pakistani front organisation, speaks gravely of his leanings & motives towards Indian interests.

NAC implications

People who know Mr. Harsh Mander would also know that he sits on the panel of the recently constituted India’s National Advisory Council [NAC]. It is important to note the fact that the creation of the NAC was a relatively recent development – less than 10 years have passed.

The reason it was constituted too are interesting & quite extra-Constitutional, if I may add. At different points of time its objectives have been identified differently. Initially it recognised itself as a body which would oversee the Common Minimum Programme promised by the government in 2004. Currently it is identified more by its claim of acting as the interface between the government & India’s civil society.

It is telling of the way NAC wishes to portray its role & has fashioned its objectives – it wants to convince the citizens of India that a group of self-appointed individuals [the civil society] are more representative of the needs & aspirations of the common people of the country than the democratically elected politicians, who have received the mandate to govern, in whatever manner, by these very common people of India for the duration of 5 years, & thus they require special access [through NAC’s “interface”] to these elected politicians of the country. Yet, despite being better aware of people’s needs & in sync with them, these members of the civil society have never been able to win any elections. The NAC’s mission hardly sounds convincing, does it?

A more plausible explanation of this extra-Constitutional authority could be traced back to the events that unfolded post-elections in India 2004. Having been elected as the single largest party in the Parliament then, the Congress was all set to stake claims to form the government by cobbling together a coalition of the willing, smaller parties. As the leader of the party with the largest number of elected politicians, & herself one such elected Member of Parliament [MP], Mrs. Sonia Gandhi, widow to the slain Prime Minister Mr. Rajiv Gandhi, daughter in-law to the slain Prime Minister Mrs. Indira Gandhi & granddaughter in-law to the deceased Prime Minister Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru, was very much within her rights to ascend to the post of the Prime Minister of India.

However, the opposition political parties latched on to the fact that she, born in Italy to Italian parents, of a father who had association with Fascism, continued to retain her Italian citizenship for long after her marriage to Mr. Rajiv Gandhi & settling down in India, living in the opulent living accommodations provided to Indian Prime Ministers. Citing her delayed revocation of her Italian citizenship as the reason for being less of an Indian after she did acquire an Indian citizenship, the opposition launched a campaign to prevent the leader of the single largest party of the Parliament from becoming India’s Prime Minister. It included a lady politician who promised to tonsure her [own] head & keep it that way for the rest of her life if Sonia Gandhi went ahead & became Prime Minister.

Thus, as a gesture of “supreme sacrifice” owing to the “love of for her adopted nation”, in a chaotic scene being beamed out of one of the congregation halls in the Parliament, Mrs. Sonia Gandhi announced that she would be relinquishing her option of becoming the Prime Minister of India. Instead, she proposed the name of Dr. Manmohan Singh, a brilliant economist, who introduced 1st generation economic reforms in India, that ushered in rapid economic development & poverty alleviations in the country during the 1990s – further reforms since then have stalled. However, what is also equally true of our current Prime Minister is that he has never won any elections held in India to date where the common citizen could have directly voted him to power. Each time he has been elected, instead, to the Upper House of the Parliament [Rajya Sabha] on strength of the vote cast by the Congress party MLA/MLCs in the state legislatures.

Thus, it would not be incorrect to say that India, which follows democratic form of government, has a Prime Minister who is not a direct representative of the people he rules over as he has not been directly voted to power by them. While not an illegal action in itself per se, since the Constitution of our country has laid down no such exception clause to become the PM, it is certainly something that is not in sync with the principles of democracy – people’s representation.

Even while Mrs. Sonia Gandhi, announced her decision to decline the post of PM-ship of the country, she continues to retain her position as the leader of her political party & also became the leader of the coalition, the United Progressive Alliance [UPA] that is currently in power in India since 2004, having been re-elected in 2009. So, in effect, the Prime minister of the Republic of India, is not only subordinate to the leader of the ruling coalition is administering, but is also not the head of his own political party – a subordinate position he holds even there. The warrant of precedence [PDF] in India states that the Prime Minister of India shall be subordinate only to the President & Vice-President of the the country. Go figure.

Meanwhile, having given up her rightful claim to head an India government, yet retaining her primacy, a way had to be found for her to exercise her authority over the government. Thus, an arbitrary, extra-Constitutional body, the National Advisory Council [NAC] was set up. She was appointed head of the body & has continued to hold the position since then. In effect, the NAC is a body to oversee the functioning of the elected government & also empowered to draft legislations & suggest changes to others before being tabled in the Parliament for enactment – as evident, it is an authority higher than the elected Government itself. A supra-government without any responsibility or accountability to the people of the country. The definition of democracy being by the people, for the people & of the people somehow does not seem to fit the paradigm of NAC’s functioning.

Since then, it has begun promoting itself as an “interface” between the government & the “civil society” of India. It begets a question, whether this civil society has arrived on Earth & settled in India from a different galaxy? If not why do they need a special interface with the government & why am I, an ordinary, honest, hardworking citizen of India being denied the benefits of using this “interface” – I am civil & a part of this society, but I also elected my interface with the government to power – the politician, as do the rest of the Indians. Then, of what use is a NAC to anybody in this civilized Indian society. Why does the civil society, like the rest of us, not interface with the government by electing their chosen candidate to the legislature? Could it be because what they wish to impose upon people does not find resonance with the rest of the people, the majority & hence they fail to have their way through valid legislative means. If that be the case, what right to they have to subvert the will of the people & enforce its own ideas by by-passing laid down norms & hijacking due process of policy formation. Does it not imply that NAC believes that a handful of people in India know what is best for the rest of us. This hardly sounds like a democracy. In fact, it absolutely & unequivocally is not a democracy, but a communist-inspired dictatorship – a police state masquerading as a democracy.

Interestingly, between the period 2006 to 2010, while she had become disqualified to head NAC owing to her other affiliations, it had become defunct for all practical purposes. It was only after she ascended back to head NAC, that it resumed wielding influence to get the Government of India to pass bills drafted by its board members. Some major bills passed by the Parliament, which were drafted & forwarded [or currently being proposed] to the Parliament by the NAC:

National Rural Employment Guarantee Act [NREGA] – Repercussion1 || Repercussion 2
National Food Security Bill [FSB] – Repercussion1 || Repercussion2
Limit number of food items served in a wedding ceremony to one – status: not known
Right to Education Act – Problem 1 || Problem 2 || Problem 3
Prevention of Communal & Targeted Violence Bill [proposed] – Repercussion 1 || Repercussion 2

As can be seen, the biggest Acts that were enacted by the Parliament & affect the Indian society & social structure were essentially drafted by the council members appointed to NAC in consultation with its Chairman, Mrs. Sonia Gandhi, who educational qualifications are indeterminate. These were then passed on to the government for getting legislated in the Parliament. Save for any bill that would have grave & detrimental implication on their prospects of getting re-elected, the government would not have much of a hesitation in passing these bills, coming from their leader the bill is.

It would be outrageous to claim that a solitary, possibly tainted Harsh Mander can single-handedly, hoodwink the entire NAC board, composed of highly educated & experienced individuals & influence them in drafting laws that would hurt & subvert India’s well-being. However, in light of the fact that Mr. Mander has had working relationship with Pakistani intelligence agencies, via an “interface”, the Justice Foundation, would it not be pertinent to probe the extent to which he had been compromised, if at all. If his guilt is proven, should he not be tried on basis of those charges, sedition, if it comes to that. Would it also not be pertinent to examine the role played by Mr. Harsh Mander in drafting the bills that have been approved in the Parliament thus far & examine if any of his accepted inputs could have been made at the behest of external agencies inimical to India, in order to stoke internal problems which could then be exploited by them. While the gentlemen is being probed would it not be fair to ask him to step down from his position at NAC, till the time his name is cleared so that the integrity of NAC remains inviolate & its functioning remain untainted by charges of sedition?

Yet, no such actions have been taken & the person, still occupies his position in the NAC & is invited by media houses to appear on television, & voice his opinion & airing suggestions on matters affecting India.

Media Reaction

It would have been natural to expect of the Indian media to jump up with glee & latch on to this news of a possible compromise of National security at the highest decision making body of the country, & dedicate a fair portion of airtime covering this news. Scandals, after all, raise Television ratings like no other & are proven advertisement magnets for media houses. As we saw, when Ghulam Nabi Fai was first exposed in the USA for working on behest of the Pakistani, these verynews channels and newspapers spent lot more than merely ‘considerable amount of time‘ reporting about it. They also brought into sharp focus the associations of, incidentally, Indian “civil society” members who had been associated with Fai in some form or the other. Similarly, earlier, when Indian embassy staff member in Pakistan, Miss. Madhuri Gupta was asked to come back to India & arrested on her arrival for having being found complicit in spying at the behest of Pakistan, the media again went all-out covering the arrest & probing every aspect of it.

While these civil society members in India are the most visible faces, owing to their propensity for hopping from one news television studio to another, voicing their opinion on every matter under the sun, their actual impact in India’s policy making has limitations, outside the government setup that they are. Yet, now, that an important member of India’s policy making has been found to have such seditious associations with the Intelligence agency of a foreign country, there is an absolute & unnatural silence in the media on this matter. Not one media outlet, be it television, newspaper or periodical, has found it an important enough a news to report. How unfortunate, if not criminal.

I Googled Mr. Harsh Mander’s name along with that of Ghulam Nabi Fai, and the following was the result I got.

Click on the image to view a larger-sized picture

I mere 2620 results. A look at the result would also reveal that most of these 2600 odd results, in fact, direct to comments posted by visitors on someone’s blog or under a related news report at the site of a MSM outlet. But no article has been written by the media themselves highlighting this connection between Harsh Mander & Ghulam Nabi Fai. Many of these sites are also auto aggregator websites that scrapes off tweets & publishes them on their site. The news was tweeted around a fair bit when the connection first came to light, with people who are followed by news personalities too joined in tweeting the news. Surely some news personality must have noticed the tweet or even otherwise, would have becomes aware of this association. Yet, from all that we watch on television, it is evident they have chosen not to report the news & make people aware of the dangerous affiliations & conduct of the people at the top. Why, I wonder?

Could this be due to their misplaced sense of prioritization, what with their drive to garner maximum TRP & subsequently dictate maximum advertisement charges, or certain interests that need protections/coerciosns applied. Either way the media has not come out looking good.

The role of the media, we’re told, is to make people aware of events unfolding around us, that have an impact on people’s lives, & help people form opinion, not impose their own, so that the people may galvanize themselves to take action using the means made available to them in democratic India by its Constitution. Yet the media in India has failed to live up to these expectations.

How shameful that we are made to live in the darkness of ignorance in a country that has been a historical wellspring of knowledge & enlightenment.


Sleuths on drive to track Rahul-baiting on net; Know reality of RAHUL GANDHI and SONIA GNADHI…..

Anonymous – Oct 30, 2011

Know reality of RAHUL GANDHI and SONIA GNADHI…..
Anonymous – Oct 30, 2011

Interestingly Sanjay Gandhi’s marriage with the Sikh girl Menaka took place in Mohammad Yunus’ house in New Delhi. Apparently Yunus was unhappy with the marriage as he wanted to get him married with a Muslim girl of his choice. It was Mohammad Yunus who cried the most when Sanjay Gandhi died in plane crash. In Yunus’ book, “Persons, Passions & Politics” (ISBN-10: 0706910176) one can discover that baby Sanjay was circumcised following Islamic custom.
It is a fact that Sanjay Gandhi used to constantly blackmail his mother Indira Gandhi, with the secret of who his real father is. Sanjay exercised a deep emotional control over his mother, which he often misused. Indira Gandhi chose to ignore his misdeeds and he was indirectly controlling the Government.
When the news of Sanjay Gandhi’s death reached Indira Gandhi, her first question was “Where are his keys and his wrist watch?”. Some deep secrets about the Nehru-Gandhi dynasty seems to be hidden in those objects.The plane accident was also mysterious. It was a new plane that nosedive to a crash and yet the plane did not explode upon impact. It happens when there is no fuel. But the flight register shows that the fuel tank was made full before take-off. Indira Gandhi using undue influence of PM’s office prohibited any inquiry from taking place. So, who is the suspect?
The book “The Life of Indira Nehru Gandhi” (ISBN: 9780007259304) by Katherine Frank sheds light on some of Indira Gandhi’s other love affairs. It is written that Indira’s first love was with her German teacher at Shantiniketan. Later she had affair with M. O. Mathai (father’s secretary), then Dhirendra Brahmachari (her yoga teacher) and at last with Dinesh Singh (Foreign Minister).
Anonymous – Oct 30, 2011

Former Foreign Minister K Natwar Singh made an interesting revelation about Indira Gandhi’s affinity to the Mughals in his book “Profile and Letters” (ISBN: 8129102358). It states that- In 1968 Indira Gandhi as the Prime Minister of India went on an official visit to Afghanistan.(Source :- Natwar Sing accompanied her as an IFS officer in duty. After having completed the day’s long engagements, Indira Gandhi wanted to go out for a ride in the evening. After going a long distance in the car, Indira Gandhi wanted to visit Babur’s burial place, though this was not included in the itinerary. The Afghan security officials tried to dissuade her, but she was adamant. In the end she went to that burial place. It was a deserted place. She went before Babur’s grave, stood there for a few minutes with head bent down in reverence. Natwar Singh stood behind her. When Indira had finished her prayers, she turned back and told Singh “Today we have had our brush with history.” Worth to mention that Babur was the founder of Mughal rule in India, from which the Nehru-Gandhi dynasty have descended.
It is difficult to count how many institutes of higher education are named after Rajiv Gandhi but, Rajiv Gandhi himself was a person of low calibre. From 1962 to 1965, he was enrolled for a Mechanical Engineering course at Trinity College, Cambridge. But, he left Cambridge without a degree because, he could not pass exams. Next year in 1966, he joined Imperial College, London but, again left it without a degree.
Anonymous – Oct 30, 2011

K. N. Rao in the above said book alleges that Rajiv Gandhi became a Catholic to marry Sania Maino. Rajiv became Roberto. His son’s name is Raul and daughter’s name is Bianca. Quite cleverly the same names are presented to the people of India as Rahul and Priyanka.
In personal conduct Rajiv was very much a Mughal. On 15th August 1988 he thundered from the ramparts of the Red Fort: “Our endeavor should be to take the country to heights to which it belonged about 250-300 years ago. It was then the reign of Aurangzeb, the ‘jeziya’ master and number one temple destroyer.”
The press conference that Rajiv Gandhi gave in London after taking over as prime minister of India was very informative. In this press conference, Rajiv boasted that he is not a Hindu but a Parsi. Feroze Khan’s father and Rajiv Gandhi’s paternal grandfather was a Muslim gentleman from the Junagadh area of Gujarat. This Muslim grocer by the name of Nawab Khan had married a Parsi woman after converting her to Islam. This is the source where from the myth of Rajiv being a Parsi was derived. Mind that he had no Parsi ancestor at all. His paternal grandmother had turned Muslim after having abandoned the Parsi religion to marry Nawab Khan. Surprisingly, Parsi Rajiv Gandhi was cremated as per Vedic rites in full view of Indian public.
Anonymous – Oct 30, 2011

Dr. Subramanian Swamy writes that Sonia Gandhi’s name was Antonia Maino. Her father was a mason. He was an activist of the notorious fascist regime of Italy and he served five years imprisonment in Russia. Sonia Gandhi have not studied beyond high school. She learnt some English from a English teaching shop named Lennox School at the Cambridge University campus. From this fact she boasts of having studied at the prestigious Cambridge University. After learning some English, she was a waitress at a restaurant in Cambridge town.
Sonia Gandhi had intense friendship with Madhavrao Scindia in the UK, which continued even after her marriage. One night at 2 AM in 1982, Madhavrao Scindia and Sonia Gandhi were caught alone together when their car met an accident near IIT Delhi main gate.When Indira Gandhi and Rajiv Gandhi were Prime Ministers, PM’s security used to go to New Delhi and Chennai international airports to send crates of Indian treasures like temple sculptures, antiques, paintings etc to Rome. Arjun Singh as CM and later as Union Minister in charge of Culture used to organize the plunder. Unchecked by customs, they were transported to Italy to be sold in two shops named Etnica & Ganpati, owned by Sonia Gandhi’s sister Alessandra Maino Vinci.

Anonymous – Oct 30, 2011

Indira Gandhi died not because her heart or brain were pierced by bullets, but she died of loss of blood. After Indira Gandhi was fired upon, Sonia Gandhi strangely insisted that bleeding Indira Gandhi should be taken to Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Hospital, in opposite direction to AIIMS which had a contingency protocol to precisely deal with such events. After reaching Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Hospital, Sonia Gandhi changed her mind and demand that Indira Gandhi should be taken to AIIMS, thus wasting 24 valuable minutes. It is doubtful whether it was immaturity of Sonia Gandhi or a trick to speedily bring her husband to power.Rajesh Pilot and Madhav Rao Scindia were strong contenders to the Prime Minister’s post and they were road blocks in Sonia Gandhi’s way to power. Both of them died in mysterious accidents.
There are circumstantial evidences pointing to the prima facie possibility that the Maino family have contracted LTTE to kill Rajiv Gandhi. Nowadays, Sonia Gandhi is quite unabashed in having political alliance with those like MDMK, PMK and DMK who praise Rajiv Gandhi’s killers. No Indian widow would ever do that. Such circumstances are many, and raise a doubt. An investigation into Sonia’s involvement in Rajiv’s assassination is necessary. You may read Dr. Subramanian Swamy’s book “Assassination Of Rajiv Gandhi — Unasked Questions and Unanswered Queries” (ISBN : 81-220-0591-8). It contains indications of such conspiracy.

Anonymous – Oct 30, 2011

In 1992, Sonia Gandhi revived her citizenship of Italy under Article 17 of the Italian Citizenship Law. Under Italian law, Rahul and Priyanka are Italian citizens because Sonia was an Italian citizen when she gave birth to them. Rahul Gandhi’s Italian is better than his Hindi. Rahul Gandhi is an Italian citizen is relevant from the fact that on 27th September 2001 he was detained by the FBI at Boston airport, USA for traveling on an Italian passport. If a law is made in India that important posts like that of President and Prime Minister should not be held by a person of foreign origin, then Rahul Gandhi automatically disqualifies to contend for the post of Prime Minister.
After finishing school education, Rahul Gandhi got admission at the St. Stephens College in New Delhi, not on merit basis but on sports quota of rifle shooting. After a brief stay there in 1989-90, he did his BA from Rollins College, Florida in 1994. Just for doing BA one need not go to the US. The very next year, in 1995 he got M.Phil. degree from Trinity College, Cambridge. The genuineness of this degree is questioned as he has done M.Phil. without doing MA. Amaratya Sen’s helping hand is thought to be behind. Many of you might have seen the famous movie “Munna Bhai MBBS”.
In 2008 Rahul Gandhi was prevented from using an auditorium of the Chandra Shekhar Azad University in Kanpur for a students’ rally. Subsequently, the Vice-Chancellor of the university, V.K. Suri, was ousted by the UP Governor. During 26/11 when the whole country was tense about how to tackle the Mumbai terror, Rahul Gandhi was lavishly partying with his friends till 5 AM. Rahul Gandhi advises austerity for all Congress members. He says it is the duty of all politicians to be austere.
Anonymous – Oct 30, 2011

On the other hand he has a ministerial bungalow with a fully equipped gym. He is a regular member of at least two of the Delhi’s poshest gyms, one of which is 5-star rated. Rahul Gandhi’s trip to Chennai in 2009 to campaign for austerity cost the party more than Rs 1 Crore. Such inconsistencies show that initiatives taken by Rahul Gandhi are not his own but, workout of his party men only.During the 2007 election campaign in Uttar Pradesh, Rahul Gandhi said that “if anyone from the Nehru-Gandhi family had been active in politics then, the Babri Masjid would not have fallen”. It doubtlessly shows his Mohammedan affiliation as a loyalty to his ancestors. On Dec 31, 2004, John M. Itty, a retired college professor in Alappuzha district of Kerala, contended that action should be taken against Rahul Gandhi and his girlfriend Juvenitta alias Veronica for staying together for three days at a resort in Kerela. It is a criminal offense under Immoral Trafficking Act as they are not married. Anyway, one more foreigner daughter-in-law is waiting to rule the tolerant Indians.

Anonymous – Oct 30, 2011

The Swiss magazine Schweizer Illustrierte’s 11th November 1991 issue revealed that Rahul Gandhi was the beneficiary of accounts worth US $2 billion controlled by his mother Sonia Gandhi. A report from the Swiss Banking Association in 2006 revealed that the combined deposits of Indian citizens are far greater than any other nation, a total of US $1.4 trillion, a figure exceeding the GDP of India. This dynasty rules greater than half of India. Ignoring the center, out of 28 states and 7 union territories, more than half of them have Congress government at any point of time. Upto Rajiv Gandhi there was Mughal rule in India, with Sonia Gandhi, the Rome rule on India have started.
The objective behind writing this article is to acquaint the citizens of India with their national leaders and show how a dynasty has misused the democracy of this country. Several prestigious national assets and schemes are named after these lose-character people to immortalize them. Many other shocking facts are not presented in this article because of lack of supporting evidence.
Anonymous – Oct 31, 2011


Sleuths on drive to track Rahul-baiting on net

T.R. VIVEK  NEW DELHI | 24th Jun

Congress general secretary Rahul Gandhi

Indian investigating authorities are unhappy with their US counterparts for not providing details of users of internet protocol (IP) addresses that were used to spread calumny against Congress general secretary Rahul Gandhi. There are nearly a dozen IP addresses traced back to the United States, which Indian investigators want to track down. The Sunday Guardianhas learnt that of those eight pertain to individuals who have posted highly defamatory comments on Rahul Gandhi on assorted social media sites. In October last year, a page titled “Know the reality about Rahul And Sonia Gandhi” containing questionable and defamatory comments about members of the Nehru-Gandhi family surfaced on Orkut, a social media network owned by Google.

Indian investigating authorities want the United States to provide information on IP addresses that were used to spread canards against the Congress general secretary.

Other IP tracing requests from India involve the serial bomb blasts in Delhi’s Gaffar Market, a fraudulent internet banking transaction, an online lottery scam case, and an online employment fraud. But the National Crime Bureau (NCB) in Washington has so far refused to provide information about the physical addresses and locations of these IP addresses. Concerned with this lack of co-operation, the Indian agencies want to sign a more binding bilateral agreement between India and the US to expeditiously share such vital information. There is a Mutual Legal Assistance Treaty (MLAT) between the two nations since 2005, but agencies such as CBI feel that the execution of request under MLAT takes so much time that crucial evidence is often lost.

A draft framework of this proposed information exchange treaty prepared by the Indian side advocates much heavy-handedness against cyber miscreants. It calls for the right to search and seizure of information processing systems, and computer data; rendering illegal material inaccessible; directing service providers to comply with special obligations, taking into account the problems caused by encryption; and interception of content data. Under the treaty India wants the US to provide subscriber information from any service provider. The subscriber details would also include the user’s identity, postal address, telephone number, and billing and payment information of the suspects. Some analysts however point out that the US is unlikely to be party to a treaty that is skewed against freedom of speech and individual privacy.