What is the real worth of Jagan Reddy? The richest MP is SoniaG, not Jagan.


India Today’s headline is blaring wrong. The richest Lok Sabha MP in India is NOT Jagan but Sonia Gandhi.

See: Sonia Gandhi: World’s Fourth Richest Politician

http://www.siliconindia.com/news/general/Sonia-Gandhi-Worlds-Fourth-Richest-Politician-nid-109106-cid-1.html

Kalyanaraman

How Jagan Reddy became the richest Lok Sabha MP in India, and what is his real worth?
A SRINIVASA RAO | Hyderabad, May 28, 2012 | 20:54


Jaganmohan Reddy.

Jaganmohan Reddy, the YSR Congress president and the richest Lok Sabha member in the country, was on Monday remanded to judicial custody till June 11 by a special court in Hyderabad.

The 40-year-old MP, who had declared his personal assets at Rs 365 crore while contesting the by-elections to the Kadapa Lok Sabha seat last year, was arrested by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) on Sunday in connection with the alleged disproportionate case.

Jagan was sent to Chanchalguda jail, which had lodged high-profile offenders such as Satyam Computers founder-chairman B Ramalinga Raju and mining tycoon Gali Janardhan Reddy, besides senior IAS officers B P Acharya and Y Srilakshmi.

On Monday morning, the CBI produced Jagan before the principal judge for CBI court A Pullaiah and sought 15 days of custody to elicit more information from him in the case. Senior CBI counsel Ashok Bhan said Jagan had not cooperated with the investigation agency during the three-day questioning. “He can no longer masquerade as a victim of the CBI probe. He has hoodwinked the people of a huge sum of money. We will now show the people about his swindling of money,” the counsel said.

The judge dismissed the plea for CBI’s custody of Jagan for further interrogation. In his order, Justice Pullaiah said the accused had the stature and position to influence the witnesses and to tamper with evidences and hence, it would be better he be sent to judicial remand under section 309 of CrPC.

The CBI counsel pointed out that there were investments in his companies to the extent of Rs 1,234 crore. “Jagan himself got enriched enormously in a short span of four years after influencing his father, the late Y.S. Rajashekhar Reddy, the then chief minister of Andhra Pradesh, in getting ill gotten money into his own firms from investors who doled out favours as part of quid pro quo,” the counsel alleged.

It is more or less a rags-to-riches story for Jagan in the last eight years. His assets had grown multi-fold during this period. As per the income tax returns submitted by his father Y.S. Rajasekhara Reddy before 2004 elections, the assets in the name of Jagan, who was then yet to enter politics, were worth just Rs 9.18 lakh. The total value of family assets declared by YSR during the 2004 elections was only Rs 50 lakh.

During 2008-09, Jagan had paid Rs 2.92 lakh tax for the entire financial year. While entering the electoral battle for the first time in April 2009, Jagan had declared that he possessed assets worth Rs 77.40 crore, including Rs 21 crore as part of his share in the ancestral property, including agriculture and non-agriculture lands at Idupulapaya and Kadapa, besides houses in Hyderabad, as inherited from his father YSR.

By May 2011, when he contested the by-elections to Kadapa Lok Sabha seat, he declared his assets before the Election Commission valuing at Rs 365 crore, besides another Rs 41.33 crore in the name of his wife Y Bharati.

His rivals say what Jagan had declared was just peanuts compared to the enormous wealth he possesses. Minister for health D L Ravindra Reddy, who had contested against Jagan in the May 2011 by-elections in Kadapa, said Jagan’s palatial bungalow at Yelahanka on the outskirts of Bangalore itself costs Rs 400 crore. The bungalow, built on 31 acres of land, has ultra modern facilities such as helipad, fountains and gardens. He has a similar posh bungalow at Jubilee Hills in Hyderabad, though not of the same opulence as his Bangalore palace. “How can Jagan claim that the total value of his assets is Rs 365 crore, when his single bungalow costs Rs 400 crore?” he asked.

According to TDP legislator and spokesman Varla Ramaiah, the value of his assets runs into several thousand crores, if one were to go by the value of the shares held by Jagan in his companies at the rate he had sold to others. “For example, while setting up Bharati Cements, Jagan raised the resources by allotting shares to various high-profile companies such as India Cements and Dalmia Cements at a high premium of Rs 1,440 per share even before the company started its manufacturing. Going by this rate, the total value of the shares held by Jagan and his family members in this cement company were worth Rs 6,650 crore those days,” Ramaiah said.

In April 2010, Jagan sold 51 per cent of the stake in Bharati Cements to French cement major SA des Ciments Vicat at an approximate value of Rs 2,500 crore.

In fact, Jagan started off with real estate projects in Bangalore and Hyderabad in the late 1990s. His first business venture was Sandur Power Company Limited, a defunct power project that he acquired from its original promoter M B Ghorpade in 2001 with an initial paid up capital of Rs 53.51 crore. The real turn around came after 2004 when his father became the chief minister.

In 2005, Jagan brought in Rs 124.60 crore investments into SPCL from two Mauritius-based companies — 2i Capital and Pluri Emerging Company. Subsequently, he floated some more companies such as Sarawati Power and Infrastrucuture Limited, Silicon Infrastructure Limited and Caramel Asia Holdings, which bought shares in Sandur at a low price and then sold them at higher rates to various industrial houses such as India Cements, Lanco group, GR Intrachem, Pioneer Infra, Pennar Cements, Hetero Drugs, Aurobindo Pharma, Indu projects etc.

The amount thus raised was invested in floating two other subsidiaries — Jagati Publications, which launched Sakshi Telugu daily in February 2008, and Indira Television, which launched Sakshi TV channel in October 2008. All thhe investors who invested in Sakshi were allegedly rewarded with various infrastructure projects, irrigation contracts and Special Economic Zones.

Simultaneously, Jagan also floated Raghuram Cements, which was later renamed as Bharati Cements. Besides, Jagan allegedly has benami investments in real estate in Bangalore and also in Brahmani Steels, which was set up in Kadapa by mining tycoon Gali Janardhan Reddy. It was suspected that he also had connections with disgraced companies Satyam Computers Limited and Maytas Infra, but the allegations have not been proved.

The CBI suspects that Jagan was also a beneficial owner of Asia Infrastructure Sicar, a Luxembourg-based company, and that certain investments were routed through this company into SPCL. It has also alleged that Jagan had floated several “briefcase companies” through which he had routed the black money into his media ventures.

http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/how-jagan-reddy-became-the-richest-mp-in-india-and-what-is-his-real-worth/1/197981.html

What is the real worth of Jagan Reddy? The richest MP is SoniaG, not Jagan.


India Today’s headline is blaring wrong. The richest Lok Sabha MP in India is NOT Jagan but Sonia Gandhi.

See: Sonia Gandhi: World’s Fourth Richest Politician

http://www.siliconindia.com/news/general/Sonia-Gandhi-Worlds-Fourth-Richest-Politician-nid-109106-cid-1.html

Kalyanaraman

How Jagan Reddy became the richest Lok Sabha MP in India, and what is his real worth?
A SRINIVASA RAO | Hyderabad, May 28, 2012 | 20:54


Jaganmohan Reddy.

Jaganmohan Reddy, the YSR Congress president and the richest Lok Sabha member in the country, was on Monday remanded to judicial custody till June 11 by a special court in Hyderabad.

The 40-year-old MP, who had declared his personal assets at Rs 365 crore while contesting the by-elections to the Kadapa Lok Sabha seat last year, was arrested by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) on Sunday in connection with the alleged disproportionate case.

Jagan was sent to Chanchalguda jail, which had lodged high-profile offenders such as Satyam Computers founder-chairman B Ramalinga Raju and mining tycoon Gali Janardhan Reddy, besides senior IAS officers B P Acharya and Y Srilakshmi.

On Monday morning, the CBI produced Jagan before the principal judge for CBI court A Pullaiah and sought 15 days of custody to elicit more information from him in the case. Senior CBI counsel Ashok Bhan said Jagan had not cooperated with the investigation agency during the three-day questioning. “He can no longer masquerade as a victim of the CBI probe. He has hoodwinked the people of a huge sum of money. We will now show the people about his swindling of money,” the counsel said.

The judge dismissed the plea for CBI’s custody of Jagan for further interrogation. In his order, Justice Pullaiah said the accused had the stature and position to influence the witnesses and to tamper with evidences and hence, it would be better he be sent to judicial remand under section 309 of CrPC.

The CBI counsel pointed out that there were investments in his companies to the extent of Rs 1,234 crore. “Jagan himself got enriched enormously in a short span of four years after influencing his father, the late Y.S. Rajashekhar Reddy, the then chief minister of Andhra Pradesh, in getting ill gotten money into his own firms from investors who doled out favours as part of quid pro quo,” the counsel alleged.

It is more or less a rags-to-riches story for Jagan in the last eight years. His assets had grown multi-fold during this period. As per the income tax returns submitted by his father Y.S. Rajasekhara Reddy before 2004 elections, the assets in the name of Jagan, who was then yet to enter politics, were worth just Rs 9.18 lakh. The total value of family assets declared by YSR during the 2004 elections was only Rs 50 lakh.

During 2008-09, Jagan had paid Rs 2.92 lakh tax for the entire financial year. While entering the electoral battle for the first time in April 2009, Jagan had declared that he possessed assets worth Rs 77.40 crore, including Rs 21 crore as part of his share in the ancestral property, including agriculture and non-agriculture lands at Idupulapaya and Kadapa, besides houses in Hyderabad, as inherited from his father YSR.

By May 2011, when he contested the by-elections to Kadapa Lok Sabha seat, he declared his assets before the Election Commission valuing at Rs 365 crore, besides another Rs 41.33 crore in the name of his wife Y Bharati.

His rivals say what Jagan had declared was just peanuts compared to the enormous wealth he possesses. Minister for health D L Ravindra Reddy, who had contested against Jagan in the May 2011 by-elections in Kadapa, said Jagan’s palatial bungalow at Yelahanka on the outskirts of Bangalore itself costs Rs 400 crore. The bungalow, built on 31 acres of land, has ultra modern facilities such as helipad, fountains and gardens. He has a similar posh bungalow at Jubilee Hills in Hyderabad, though not of the same opulence as his Bangalore palace. “How can Jagan claim that the total value of his assets is Rs 365 crore, when his single bungalow costs Rs 400 crore?” he asked.

According to TDP legislator and spokesman Varla Ramaiah, the value of his assets runs into several thousand crores, if one were to go by the value of the shares held by Jagan in his companies at the rate he had sold to others. “For example, while setting up Bharati Cements, Jagan raised the resources by allotting shares to various high-profile companies such as India Cements and Dalmia Cements at a high premium of Rs 1,440 per share even before the company started its manufacturing. Going by this rate, the total value of the shares held by Jagan and his family members in this cement company were worth Rs 6,650 crore those days,” Ramaiah said.

In April 2010, Jagan sold 51 per cent of the stake in Bharati Cements to French cement major SA des Ciments Vicat at an approximate value of Rs 2,500 crore.

In fact, Jagan started off with real estate projects in Bangalore and Hyderabad in the late 1990s. His first business venture was Sandur Power Company Limited, a defunct power project that he acquired from its original promoter M B Ghorpade in 2001 with an initial paid up capital of Rs 53.51 crore. The real turn around came after 2004 when his father became the chief minister.

In 2005, Jagan brought in Rs 124.60 crore investments into SPCL from two Mauritius-based companies — 2i Capital and Pluri Emerging Company. Subsequently, he floated some more companies such as Sarawati Power and Infrastrucuture Limited, Silicon Infrastructure Limited and Caramel Asia Holdings, which bought shares in Sandur at a low price and then sold them at higher rates to various industrial houses such as India Cements, Lanco group, GR Intrachem, Pioneer Infra, Pennar Cements, Hetero Drugs, Aurobindo Pharma, Indu projects etc.

The amount thus raised was invested in floating two other subsidiaries — Jagati Publications, which launched Sakshi Telugu daily in February 2008, and Indira Television, which launched Sakshi TV channel in October 2008. All thhe investors who invested in Sakshi were allegedly rewarded with various infrastructure projects, irrigation contracts and Special Economic Zones.

Simultaneously, Jagan also floated Raghuram Cements, which was later renamed as Bharati Cements. Besides, Jagan allegedly has benami investments in real estate in Bangalore and also in Brahmani Steels, which was set up in Kadapa by mining tycoon Gali Janardhan Reddy. It was suspected that he also had connections with disgraced companies Satyam Computers Limited and Maytas Infra, but the allegations have not been proved.

The CBI suspects that Jagan was also a beneficial owner of Asia Infrastructure Sicar, a Luxembourg-based company, and that certain investments were routed through this company into SPCL. It has also alleged that Jagan had floated several “briefcase companies” through which he had routed the black money into his media ventures.

http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/how-jagan-reddy-became-the-richest-mp-in-india-and-what-is-his-real-worth/1/197981.html

Vishakanya (Antonia Maino AKA Sonia Gandhi) became the sole beneficiary of the bizarre death/assasinations of 3 Gandhis

Conspiracy theory was formulated by the Indian Intelligence but higher up killed the idea

A first person account of one of the team members who investigated

http://bharatkalyan97.blogspot.in/2012/05/sonia-gandhi-ex-indian-intelligence.html

On Sonia Gandhi – Blog by Ex-Indian Intelligence Analyst (Nishkamya)

Nishkamya’s Blog
Just another WordPress.com site

From Blog of Ex-Indian Intelligence
Posted on December 6, 2011 2

Given Kapil Sibal’s ravings and rantings I thought it best to save the contents of this blog before it was brought down.
http://indianintelligence2009.blogspot.com/
Monday, September 21, 2009
Playing with a nation’s choices
Part 1 : Three funerals and a wedding

Prologue
I was part of various analysis teams of Indian intelligence agencies during the 80’s and 90’s and now live a anonymous life in a distant land. What I am going to propagate over a 3 part series in the next few days might seem very farfetched and even fantastic to most people and many conspiracy theorists might gleefully accept it as vindication for whatever they have been screaming from rooftops for quite some time now. My attempt though is neither to please any one nor to prove someone else wrong or right; it is just to come out with the truth as we perceived it. Most of the theory that I am going to put forward in part 1 is the work of us 5 people in 1991 while analyzing all the intelligence inputs over the years in connection with the assassination of former Prime Minister Mr. Rajiv Gandhi. We in the intelligence parlays termed it as “the Rajiv brief”. Most conclusions that we had come up with were unanimous and unequivocal. I must hasten to add that many parts of this so called “the Rajiv brief” were also part of an earlier analysis done in the mid 80’s by another team investigating the conspiracy angle to Mrs Indira Gandhi’s death. Theoretic overlapping in terms of evidences, intelligence briefings and logical conclusions between these two analysis reports might be common, but there are also significant points of divergence in both of these reports and since I have been privy to both I would suggest that the number of points of convergence between both sets of analysis far outnumber the differences. Sometime in the middle of 1992 we were suddenly asked to debunk the whole theory and change our line of thinking by powers that be, and we had to let go of a “very strong” case that we were building then. Of the core group of 5 analysts who were working on that case, 3 are no more (all died of normal causes) and 2 of us are still living anonymously without being in touch with each other. This is my attempt (after almost 2 decades) to complete “the Rajiv brief” and take it to its logical conclusion with the benefit of hindsight. I must warn though, that this is at the end of the day, just a theory based on intelligence inputs and field analysis built on a very plausible premise. It is an attempt to fill in the blanks between the “if’s” and “buts” of history with the luxury of retrospective intelligence.
The Theory: Five people four scenarios and three events
Mrs Sonia Gandhi is today the most powerful person in India and probably one of the most powerful women on earth. Elections 2009 have only reinforced her power. How did she end up becoming the most powerful person in India? This is the story of that ascendancy. Five people, four scenarios and three events stood between Mrs Sonia Gandhi and her destiny. Over the next few pages I am going to explain those scenarios through the eyes of a former intelligence analyst.
Scenario 1: The Rajiv-Sonia marriage
At the outset there is nothing more than just another love story to Mr Rajiv Gandhi’s romance with Miss Antonia Albina Maino in the mid 1960’s. Any suggestion that there were characters in the Cambridge university campus that not only hooked them up but also nurtured the famous romance is too farfetched. But having said that, let us consider some of the London tabloid reports of that time which variously suggested Rajiv was “constantly influenced” by a couple of students of European origin (I would not take names and let researchers do some hard work) and that at least one of those students was later absorbed by the Vatican’s intelligence wing. It would also be farfetched to speculate on Indian intelligence requesting the help of MI5 to analyze the Rajiv-Sonia romance, at least am not aware of any such report ever being filed. All these rumours and theories have done their rounds in the intelligence quarters of Delhi, especially during 1991-1992, but then we are rushing ahead of time so we shall deal with that later. I would now present as to what intelligence agencies actually did, which was very little, and let people draw their own conclusion.
Background
Post World War 1, Turin was a hub of political activity. Communism was at its peak in Europe and many left leaning socialist organizations were dabbling with the Marxist ideology and as a counter balance to that the fascist forces were emerging as an attractive alternative to many Catholics of Italy, and Turin was no exception. The small village of Orbassano near Turin mainly composed of orthodox Roman Catholic families and they all dreaded the arrival of communists on their shores and decided to join hands with the fascists lead by Mussolini. Paolo Maino was one of them. Indian intelligence gathering techniques are never given their due credit, but we have done some first rate jobs which have never been acknowledged and Mrs Sonia Gandhi’s background check was one of them. It was found that after the end of Second World War when many fascists were purged, Paolo Maino was protected by the church and no less than the Vatican itself intervened in his case and all papers pertaining to him were there by transferred to the Vatican! It was furthermore established that one of the more mysterious uncles of Paolo Maino worked for the super secret intelligence organization of the Vatican, the Opus Dei. Paolo was a construction contractor and had little savings; he could not entirely afford the educational and other expenses of his children. This mysterious uncle; who was working for the Opus Dei and whose name had been deleted from all the intelligence files; sponsored Antonio Albina Maino’s education in Cambridge in the 1960’s.
During her stay in Cambridge Miss Antonio took an “unusually high degree” of interest in the activities of groups concerning students of Indian Diaspora much before she met Rajiv. In fact, their first meeting took place in the presence of other Indian origin students and not in a Greek cafe as widely reported later. But throughout all of this she continued her association with the church and its activities and was in constant touch with “certain sections of the Vatican” which were previously also associated with the fascists. When Indian intelligence officials later questioned one of Miss Antonio’s close associates during her stay in the Cambridge, he described her relationship with the Vatican as akin to “umbilical cord”. All of these titbits were filed by many field officers of various intelligence agencies over a period of years but most analysts in the intelligence parlays of India termed them as “innocent” at worst and “needs evaluation” at best. Of course one can always concede that the analysts of that era lack the luxury of retrospective analysis as we do have now, there was definitely some lax attitude shown by these analysts in trying to decipher these events. Thus one day in 1968, after 3 odd years of courtship Mr. Rajiv Gandhi and Miss Antonio Maino; the daughter of former Fascist soldier, Paolo Maino; were married in Delhi. Miss Maino then became Mrs Sonia Gandhi for all intentions and purposes and the stepping stone to her destiny was covered with roses.
Scenario 2: Event 1, June 23rd 1980
The first player in the political theatre to have been eliminated and also the most important first link to the series of events that led to the present dispensation in the corridors of Delhi. Circumstantial evidence in the June 23rd 1980 Sanjay Gandhi air crash near Safdarjung airport points to foul play but let’s not get sucked into those futile arguments that have been raging ever since. Just suffice it to say that the single-member enquiry commission headed by Mr M L Jain which was formed to study the circumstances that lead to the plane crash has never submitted any report what so ever to the government in 3 decades. Now isn’t that fishy?
Background
Anybody who is aware of the 70’s brand of politics in India would know that Sanjay was the most important political centre, around whom most of the power was concentrated and dispensed with. Many even believed that Sanjay wielded more power than Indira Gandhi herself. It thus became pertinent for most intelligence agencies concerned with India’s affairs to have a thick case file about Sanjay Gandhi and his activities. There were some widely debunked theories of the junior Gandhi leaning towards CIA and Mrs Gandhi not being in agreement with his ideas, I do not know the origin or the veracities of these hypotheses so I would not make any comment either to encourage or discourage them. The 1960’s and 70’s Delhi was a hub of international espionage (like any other capital of any other country) because most intelligence agencies (including CIA & KGB) of that era depended on HUMINT or human intelligence officers to gather intelligence rather than satellites and drones of today. Every other day there would be speculation in the media circles of a certain politician or a certain bureaucrat working in tandem with a certain foreign intelligence agency; I would be lying if I claimed that all these speculations were wrong, in fact there were quite a few surprises in the “official” list that the Indian intelligence agencies maintained, but that is a completely different subject altogether. Coming back to Sanjay Gandhi and the interest that he generated in foreign as well as Indian intelligence circles, one thing is clear, he never worked or had any relationship with any of the foreign intelligence agencies and that much I can vouch for, but the same cannot be said about his continuous indulgence and interference with the local intelligence agencies. He always used and had his men in various wings of Indian intelligence agencies. Amidst all of this originated the “Russian hypothesis”.
There is no agreement as to when the real “Russian hypothesis” came into being, some argue that just prior to emergency in 1975 the Soviets sponsored this study because they had prior intelligence that emergency would be imposed on India, while still others argue that its origin was sometime during the Morarji Desai regime. I for one tend to agree with the former because it is a known fact that Soviets were consulted by Mrs Gandhi about emergency. Another reason to support the 1975 theory is that a secret meeting of the dreaded VKR had taken place in Delhi in the summer of 1975 (VKR = Voennaya Kontra Razvedka) and it had baffled many Indian intelligence officials as to why VKR (Russian counter intelligence wing) would meet in India. After the imposition of emergency and the awareness about Mrs Gandhi’s soviet consultation, intelligence circles widely accepted the theory of VKR meeting in Delhi as a part of that Indo-Soviet collaboration on emergency until the emergence of the “Russian hypothesis” and the eventual demise of Mr. Sanjay Gandhi. KGB had strong presence in Delhi and across India in the 70’s and many left-leaning analysts openly and covertly co-operated with KGB and other Russian intelligence agencies. One such “analyst” was part of the team that had produced the “Russian hypothesis” and he later (in 1979) leaked parts of that document to Indian intelligence and that is how the jigsaw puzzle was cracked. In the hypothesis it was concluded that Mr Sanjay Gandhi was west leaning and a capitalist and would eventually side with the CIA, although there was no universal agreement about these conclusions amongst the team that had produced the “Russian hypothesis” most of them did agree to some extent of those conclusions. It was our belief that the Soviets had decided not to take any action, mainly because of the fact that it was unlikely of KGB and even more unlikely in the case of VKR to remain quiet for more than a few months after having reached a conclusion. This is when Opus Dei comes into picture. It is a well known fact that Opus Dei and parts of Russian intelligence had always collaborated on certain matters. Exactly how or when did Opus Dei come into the possession of “Russian hypothesis” is merely in the realm of speculation but what is incontrovertible is that the Vatican intelligence did have enormous influence on Josef Stavinoha, the man who was heading VKR at that time and thus KGB in active collaboration with Opus Dei decided to act on the “Russian hypothesis” sometime in March 1980. As a direct result of that, June 23rd 1980 happened as an accident.
Continuum
After the sudden demise of Mr Sanjay Gandhi, there was the question of two other people, the very political wife Mrs Maneka Gandhi and son Mr Varun Gandhi which had to be dealt with by the Gandhi family. While there is no denying the fact that Mrs Indira Gandhi and her daughter in law Mrs Maneka Gandhi had a less than cordial relationship (which was more accentuated after the arrival of Rajiv’s family, as per some household sources of the family) and usually had typical “saas-bahu” war of turfs, but what is also irrefutable is the fact that Mr Varun Gandhi was Mrs Gandhi’s favourite grandson and she simply doted on him. What exactly transpired and who facilitated the events are all debates of speculation for the tabloid media, but one thing is certain, both the widowed mother and son were completely sidelined and almost ceased to exist as far as the Gandhi family is concerned after ceremoniously being thrown out of the Prime Minister’s residence.
Scenario 3: 1984, the assassination of Mrs Indira Gandhi
It was one of those events in the young life of a nation that can be termed as a defining moment in history. At the outset it was a clear case of Khalistani fundamentalists avenging operation blue-star, but there were many characters at the periphery and many events preceding it which raised many an eyebrow in the intelligence communities of the world. This was also that one colossal event that catapulted the young Mr Rajiv Gandhi, a novice in politics, to the highest seat of power in South Asia and Mrs Sonia Gandhi was now the next in the line of succession by the virtue of being his wife.
Background
It is a historically well known fact that the Khalistan movement was nurtured by ISI and certain elements in Pakistan. Also well recorded are the initial reactions of some western countries like Canada who almost directly hobnobbed with the Sikh separatist leaders only to abandon them when the movement became increasingly violent. Tacit support of US and British intelligence agencies to the Khalistan intelligentsia was also much speculated upon those days. But what was a lesser known fact in the media and a matter of puzzling debates in the intelligence circles was the interest shown by the Vatican in the Khalistan movement. In 1980-81 Vatican had an open channel of discussions with certain groups of the so called “intellectuals” who were known sympathisers of the Sikh separatist movements. This interest and interactions continued well into the early 80’s and were explained as the “right of Vatican to have an interest in other religious organizations”. At the height of Khalistan movement just after operation Blue Star, many reliable Indian intelligence sources had given “definitive” information about Opus Dei funding parts of operations of Sikh separatists outside India!
After operation Blue Star there were many intelligence inputs about the threat to Mrs Gandhi’s life including some specific inputs about people in the core inner circle of Mrs Gandhi’s security system being vulnerable. Yet no action was taken, why? The assassination of Mrs Indira Gandhi was a massive intelligence failure to say the least and yet no major enquiry was ordered to decipher the conspiracy theory, why? Sections of KGB and other Russian intelligence agencies had given a specific timeframe regarding “action” and yet their advice went unheeded, why? Soviet sources, in informal briefings had warned about certain western intelligence agencies being in cahoots with Sikh separatists and yet those warnings were disregarded, why?
A part of the answer to those questions can be explained as plain incompetence as usual. May be one can also argue that we now have the power of hindsight which we lacked then. But definitely there is a part of the answer to that question which is more complex and only takes my theory forward to its logical conclusion. It is not as if we did nothing, security experts and Intelligence aficionados gave at least 2 formal specific presentations to Mrs Gandhi on 2 different occasions about the need to re-haul the entire security apparatus around her. But on both these occasions apart from Mrs Gandhi’s nonchalance we met with the biggest resistance from one particular member of her core team. He was a very powerful member of what was then known to the media as “kitchen cabinet” and had also been described as a “power broker of the highest degree” by many media houses and visiting dignitaries. There was no reason to suspect any mal-intentions in him, as he was also known to be very close to Mr Rajiv Gandhi (unlike some members of the “kitchen cabinet” who had a turf war with the junior Gandhi). Post assassination there was a bit of a stir in the media about the same gentleman followed by hush-hush events. We in the intelligence were also surprised to know about his strong linkages with certain Western intelligence agencies. Nothing really happened after that for quite some time and Mr Rajiv Gandhi only restored the same gentleman back in his team with full honours and the whole episode was laid to rest. But the biggest revelation to the intelligence wings came a little later (and was not accorded much importance at that time). Unlike media perceptions that the said gentleman belonged to the Rajiv Gandhi coterie and to the “kitchen cabinet”, he actually owed both his positions and his re-instatement into the inner circles of power after the assassination of Mrs Gandhi to a certain Mrs Sonia Gandhi!
Scenario 4: 1991, the assassination of Mr Rajiv Gandhi
When Mr Rajiv Gandhi was assassinated in Sriperumbudur on 21st May 1991, it did come as a shock to the intelligence community in India but it would be false to suggest that we had absolutely no clue about it. Tamil Tigers animosity towards Mr Rajiv Gandhi was by no means a universally accepted fact in the intelligence circles and yet there were “elements” in the establishment who had assessed the risk factors from time to time. Many analysts had pointed out way back in 1985 (when Rajiv first tried to establish channels to tigers) the unpredictable nature of the leadership of LTTE and their perceived closeness to “certain” European and Western intelligence agencies. Mr Rajiv Gandhi was more influenced by a section of foreign policy analysts and he paid little heed to whatever little reservations the Indian intelligence agencies had vis-à-vis Tamil Tigers. I must confess that intelligence community in India did not really cover themselves in glory in this whole episode, because it might come as a surprise to most readers to know that we had threat perception for Mr Rajiv Gandhi from many other quarters like Sikh separatists, Islamic (Pakistani funded) militant groups, Chinese sponsored mercenaries and even rogue KGB agents, but had very few inputs and analysis about Tamil Tigers! That was a grave error to say the least. Due to myriad intelligence inputs and even more complex analysis the enquiry following the assassination was mired in many ideas and was muddled in too many complexities.
Background
The Rajiv Gandhi era was defined by two major geo-political changes in India and South Asia;
· Pakistan’s involvement with separatist groups in Kashmir and the birth of Islamic terrorism in the valley
· India’s direct mediation in Sri Lanka vis-à-vis Tamil issue
Both these geo-political affairs in South Asia had linkages to Western intelligence agencies at some point or other. It is a well known fact that CIA did help Kashmiri terror outfits in the initial years ostensibly to decrease Soviet influence in the region and also because US intelligence establishments were day dreaming about controlling all forms of Islamic extremist organisations from Afghanistan and Central Asia to the Middle-East and Western Africa. The results of those ill-fated forays have been disastrous as we have seen today, but that is a different story for some other time. Lesser known fact is the support to LTTE by many European intelligence agencies including MI5 & NIS (Norwegian Intelligence Service). Thus, although Mr Rajiv Gandhi considered Mr Vellupali Prabhakaran as a personal friend, the LTTE leader was more under the influence of many other intelligence organisations than India which should have been his natural ally. If the Western intelligence agencies wanted to eliminate Mr Rajiv Gandhi (for whatever myriad reasons) they had 2 very plausible ways to achieve their hit; Islamic Terror outfits in Kashmir and LTTE; apart from many other difficult options. LTTE having assassinated Mr Rajiv Gandhi unilaterally can be ruled out for all practical purposes as it was too much under the influence and control of many agencies and also it would have needed a thorough assurance that its own organization would not be eliminated following the assassination. Mr Prabhakaran, whatever else he was, was a practical man with very sensible ideas to survive for a long term struggle for Tamil Elam. He would have realized at the very outset that eliminating Mr Rajiv Gandhi could become an existential threat to LTTE itself. He had the precedence of the Khalistan movement being crushed following Mrs Indira Gandhi’s assassination and the might of IPKF, which had almost managed to destroy about 80% of LTTE.
Mr Prabhakaran apart from being Tamil was also a catholic and there is a theory that the Vatican had helped LTTE in the initial phases to establish a “catholic” land in the Northern parts of Sri Lanka independent of the “Buddhist” Sinhalese regime. I have many intelligence inputs to confirm these linkages between the Vatican and the LTTE. Norway which had always played a role in the Sri Lankan peace process had a commanding influence over LTTE, especially over the northern faction of LTTE comprising Prabhakaran and co. Norwegian intelligence or NIS had not only given financial assistance but also had provided military training and logistical support to many northern LTTE command groups. I must state here that the western part of LTTE led by Karuna and co was less under the influence of these organisations and was more open to collaboration with India. There was also an unconfirmed report that Karuna was against the whole plot to assassinate Mr Rajiv Gandhi and had even tried in vain to contact Indian intelligence agencies about the impending attack. NIS and other Scandinavian intelligence agencies in the 80’s and early 90’s were also heavily under the influence of Opus Dei and other intelligence establishments of the Vatican. There were many reasons for this, primary being the fact Norway’s borders with Soviet Russia and the Opus Dei’s final plans to liberate the orthodox Russian church from the communists. Finally, we have very strong intelligence inputs about NIS having given the final order of a “hit” on Mr Rajiv Gandhi and also the requisite assurance of “no-attack” from India on LTTE in any eventuality. Thus Prabhakaran decided to assassinate Mr Rajiv Gandhi despite internal opposition and many apprehensions. What is even more curious was the timing of attack (which was also a pre-condition by the Norwegian controllers of LTTE as per many intercepts of Russian intelligence revealed to India much later). It was as if someone wanted to influence the ensuing general elections in India by assassinating a tall leader (they had the precedent of 1985 elections following Mrs Gandhi’s killing). But, they only partly succeeded in that as congress could not get a majority on its own which was partially due to the fact that a part of those elections were held before the event and partially due to the changed political scenario of India in the beginning of the 90’s.
The Analysis
After the assassination many intelligence teams were working on many number of theories and officially SIT (special investigation team) was formed to fast track the whole process and at least theoretically all these intelligence teams were supposed to be working under the aegis of the SIT. We were a group of 5 analysts working on the conspiracy angle (there were other groups of people also working on many conspiracy theories) leading up to the assassination. This is when we first stumbled upon the theory of the Vatican’s interest in India’s 1st family (the Gandhi family), which was earlier researched by a team previously working on the killing of senior Mrs Gandhi. Layer by layer we were gathering all the previous inputs and seemingly farfetched hypothesises put forward by many people in the past. Most of the inputs that I have talked about till now throughout this paper (part 1) were discovered and analysed during those 6 months when we worked together in that team. Mr P. V. Narasimha Rao was the Prime Minister of India then and he had made it a point to get all the reports on the Rajiv Gandhi assassination case delivered to him directly (with no intermediaries) at regular intervals. I remember it correctly, when we had sent our detailed analysis report with all the relevant intelligence inputs to the PMO on a Thursday afternoon. The report contained all the various theories that we had suggested but we had not reached any conclusions.
The first time it’s a chance, the second time it’s a coincidence and the third time it’s a pattern. I guess it was just a matter of time before we would reach the conclusion that the sole beneficiary of all these scenarios and events was the one and only Mrs Sonia Gandhi, the widow of Mr Rajiv Gandhi. How 3 events (assassination & “unnatural” deaths of the three Gandhis) and the 4 scenarios involving 5 people who were either eliminated or completely sidelined leading to the final destiny of Mrs Sonia Gandhi is really a fascinating story. On Monday morning our team was dismantled, we were asked to work on another theory of CIA’s involvement with the LTTE and about understanding the financial structuring of the Tamil Tigers and we were told in no uncertain terms to abandon our “farfetched” theories and to work on more “realistic” aspects that would provide more tangible results.
After that we never mentioned about “the Rajiv brief” or about what had happened in those 6 months. But I have been keeping track of events since then. One important loophole about the theory as explained till now would be the reluctance of Mrs Sonia Gandhi to accept the position of power after the 1991 elections. I would like to deal with the post Rajiv era in part 2 when I will hopefully explain all of those issues. I have formulated my own set of theories and have reached my own conclusions, but they will be elaborated upon in the next 2 parts of this treatise.

… To be continued.
Like
Be the first to like this post.
Posted in: Uncategorized
← Murdered Shamans, Witch Burnings & Indian TraditionsThe Lynching of Dharun Ravi →
2 Responses “From Blog of Ex-Indian Intelligence” →

Garima Obrah
December 31, 2011
Hi Nishka, I am writing to you on behalf of The Viewspaper regarding a major event on Twitter. If interested, please contact us at garimao@theviewspaper.net
Regards,
Garima
Reply

Pamela Sahi
April 30, 2012
When is Part 2 coming?
Reply
http://nishkamya.wordpress.com/2011/12/06/from-blog-of-ex-indian-intelligence/
The Curious Case of Sonia Gandhi & Sloan-Kettering
Posted on August 7, 2011 19

As I google all the various articles and write-ups on this subject, I rue the fact that I did not have the foresight to save the informative articles tweeted.
Nevertheless the entire episode of of Sonia Maino-Gandhi’s purported serious surgery (from congress sources) which was supposedly for cervical cancer and which has now mutated into a story (by supposedly congress sources) of benign skin cancer (why would that require a serious surgery is a question that begs to be answered) is mind bogglingly bizarre. Can you imagine these permutations and combinations about say a US president? That country would be up in arms. Nevertheless we should explore all the different versions floating around.
Version 1: Serious surgery for cervical cancer
Sonia diagnosed with cervical cancer
http://www.deccanherald.com/content/181508/sonia-diagnosed-cervical-cancer.html
A brief statement put out by the party said Sonia underwent a surgery on August 4 and the surgeon has indicated that the operation has been successful. It, however, did not disclose the reasons that necessitated Sonia to undergo the surgery. Nor did the statement mention the hospital or the country where she underwent the surgery.
http://indiafirstedition.com/sonia-gandhi-hospitalised-in-new-york-cervical-cancer-suspected/
AICC spokesperson Janaradhana Dviwedi today made a statement on Sonia’s health condition. Dviwedi told that Sonia Gandhi is completely safe and she needs to rest for 3 weeks according to what the doctors have conveyed to him.
Needless to say, as with everything else related to the Maino Gandhi clan, the country knew nothing of this. Prime Minister Manmohan Singh’s surgery was literally a public affair done at AIIMs.
But despite all that, surely someone in the nation would have known if this was diagnosed as people are hearing now, atleast a year ago. There has not been a peep from any quarter.
Also, Sonia Maino-Gandhi’s activities prior to the surgery were strange to say the least. Post the June 5th whacking at Ramlilla grounds, she whizzed all over Europe with her son and UPA courtiers the primary destination being Zug in Switzerland. Now Zug is not a center of medical facilities. Google for what it is.
On July 25th she was in Bangladesh accepting an award on behalf of Indira Gandhi (as an aside, during the Bangladesh war she, hubby and kids absconded to safety in Italy).
http://www.newsofdelhi.com/news-from-india/sonia-gandhi-get-the-highest-award-of-bangladesh-from-prime-minister-sheikh-hasina
One must commend her on keeping her form despite being a cervical cancer patient for some time. As per Dean Nelson, she has been receiving treatment for 8 months (this is news to India). Looks pretty good in picture above.
Her family and clan are supposed to be with her. Who is footing the bill is another question altogether.
Version 2: Hanging around in NYC, Waiting for Treatment
Post the news about her surgery, came the tweets from Subramaniun Swamy as below -:
Subramanian Swamy@Swamy39
CNN-IBN has a pulled a fast one on the Indian public. Sonia has not been operated yet. Dr. Nori is vacationing in Europe. She and –next
5 Aug 11 ReplyRetweetFavorite
CNN-IBN has a pulled a fast one on the Indian public. Sonia has not been operated yet. Dr. Nori is vacationing in Europe. She and –next
Subramanian Swamy@Swamy39
40 others mostly foreigners living a huge posh apartment in NYC. Her first test in hospital on Tuesday.
5 Aug 11 ReplyRetweetFavorite
40 others mostly foreigners living a huge posh apartment in NYC. Her first test in hospital on Tuesday.
Subramanian Swamy@Swamy39
Dr. Nori no more with Sloan-K but with another hospital, but could be loaned to Sloan-K for this operation. He has been contacted by them
5 Aug 11 ReplyRetweetFavorite
Dr. Nori no more with Sloan-K but with another hospital, but could be loaned to Sloan-K for this operation. He has been contacted by them
Subramanian Swamy@Swamy39
Sonia’s entourage is paying $ 40 000 a day for expenses for staying in two floors of plush Manhattan apartment.Lawyers and bankers arriving.
7 Aug 11 ReplyRetweetFavorite
Sonia’s entourage is paying $ 40 000 a day for expenses for staying in two floors of plush Manhattan apartment.Lawyers and bankers arriving.
Sandeep@steadyhunk 11 Aug 11
@Swamy39 So, whose side the India is on, Italian clan or Indian constitution..i am with Indian constitution @shivsinghDESH @Meedana @vbg111
Subramanian Swamy@Swamy39
@steadyhunk @shivsinghDESH @Meedana @vbg111 : Indian Consulate told to stay away totally from Sonia. Some foreign security in charge!!
11 Aug 11 ReplyRetweetFavorite
Indian Consulate told to stay away totally from Sonia. Some foreign security in charge!!
Dr. Swamy is in the US presently and is one person who usually has access to really good sources. So we are pretty much halfway there.
Then to take us all the way there came this bombshell-:
http://www.firstpost.com/politics/new-pmo-man-pulok-oversaw-sonias-sloan-kettering-move-55315.html?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter
India’s Gandhi family has pulled off something most powerful American political dynasties can’t (or don’t) do. The Sloan-Kettering Cancer Centre does not have Sonia Gandhi’s name in the hospitalised patient data system. At this point she is a ghost!
Members of the Indian Overseas Congress trickled into the Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center to get news about the Congress leader and glimpse her children Rahul and Priyanka and son-in-law Robert Vadra. The wait has proved futile so far but the vigil continues on Friday.
Huh!
Version 3: Relatively benign skin cancer
This is a recent theory being floated by some media channels in India. I can assure you that the Indian channels would not float this theory without a nod from someone in the Congress. Sonia Maino-Gandhi is after all the uncrowned queen and the implication of random theories would be too much for a media channel.

She has benign skin cancer and will be back soon
This is the weirdest of all stories -:
Why is she in Sloan-Kettering for a benign skin cancer treatment? That would be fairly easy to treat in India and at much lower costs. Her whole crew is in NYC and they are supposedly booking hotel like suites in the hospital for a skin cancer treatment!!!
Why was she in ICU after a serious surgery? Benign skin cancer can be treated through localised radiation.
Version 4 – Breast Cancer
This is the newest of theories floating around. The primary source of this is someone on twitter whose ob/gyn friend works at Sloan and has heard this theory but is not sure.
This theory is completely bogus and at the same level as the skin cancer affair. The spin masters are now spreading rumors amongst the doctors of the hospital so that the lie appears credible. Fact is that only a small inner circle would be treating Sonia and they will have to be very tight-lipped. Someone is spinning rumors at the hospital to give this story a ring of credibility.
Conclusion
I’ll leave the reader to figure out what the truth may be. Obviously, with this clan nothing is as it seems. The theories of what may be happening have insidious to relatively benign implications for the nation.
I believe that what happened was that some hapless congressman revealed the truth about Sonia’s cervical cancer. As with most people in India he was not aware of some of the origins of this form of cancer. The news spread and all was well and good till Indians started researching the root causes of cervical cancer. Unfortunately a little knowledge is a dangerous thing and people are jumping to all sorts of conclusion. Since then the congress spin machine has it’s knickers in a twist and is bringing out as many versions as possible. As expert propagandists, they are fully aware that people will not buy the skin cancer theory and see through why the cover-up. Instead, the best they can hope for is to confuse the masses within all sorts of different versions of cancer. That way as with the rest of the facts about the Gandhi clan this fact will also get obfuscated in permutations and combinations.
I am also beginning to believe that more in happening in NYC than meets the eye. There is succession planning and wheeling-dealing that is potentially happening. This probably explains the uber secrecy behind this visit.
PS: If Sonia had come out in the open about her cervical cancer, no one would have thought anything about it. HPV is dangerously easy to pass and many women in India get it.
PPS: Latest Update (2/9/2011)
Two more theories are doing rounds. Sonia Gandhi has Glioma of the brain and/or she has pancreatic cancer. Additionally, people really don’t know where she is. There have been rumours of her being in Johns Hopkins, Howard Hughes medical center and so on and so forth. She has been due to arrive in India within 2-3 days for the last 2 weeks.

http://nishkamya.wordpress.com/2011/08/07/the-curious-case-of-sonia-gandhi-sloan-kettering/

The Strange Visits of the Maino-Gandhi Clan
Posted on August 8, 2010 5

This is just a smattering of visits that have been widely discussed. Visits when Rajiv Gandhi was PM are not included. I am certain that this is just the tip of the iceberg. I leave you to draw your own conclusions.
Sonia & Raul’s visit to the US (2010)
http://politicsparty.com/sonia_syndrome.php
http://www.indianexpress.com/news/her-mother-ill-sonia-flies-to-us-with-rahul/653776/
This was a most bizarre visit with Sonia and Raul MIA for both, a crucial meeting with David Cameroon and the monsoon session of the Parliament. The masses knew nothing, the media kept mum till people began to ask and the congress spin machine got back into action with a “Paola Maino” needs advanced tests. Raul returned on August 2nd to silence the rumbles. The media started spreading the supposed truth.
This nation deserves complete transparency from it’s leaders (servants of the people, right). Questions that need to be asked are; Why was the Maino-Gandhi clan silent about the reason for the visit, after all an ailing mother is nothing to be ashamed of? Who is footing the bill? Why is Paola Maino who spends all her time in Delhi not being treated in AIIMs or for that matter in Italy, the latter has top of the line hospitals? Was it really Paola Maino’s illness that prompted this hush-hush visit? Does it have to do with any of the defence deals currently being inked and the corresponding Cayman flows? Is there any relationship with the happy eruption in Kashmir?
You will see that Paola Maino has had a long association with defence dalaals. Quottrocchi anyone? Surprisingly it is not unusual that “defence deal”, “suspicious visit” and Paola Maino intersect. There is more on her later in the list.
Below is Swamy’s tweet on the subject
@Swamy39 : She and siblings plus progeny plus Q are in London working out how the recently discovered gold bars of the Nehrus can be split.
Rauls disappearance/visit in Orissa (2008)
http://ibnlive.in.com/news/rahuls-detour-into-naxal-area-angers-orissa-mps/61075-3.html
http://www.freshnews.in/lok-sabha-disrupted-over-rahul-gandhis-night-out-in-orissa-22976
http://www.bloggernews.net/114439
We all know that Orissa is a hotbed of Maoist-Missionary activity a lot of which is driven by the rich natural resources of the state. Do read “Thy will be done”http://www.amazon.com/Thy-Will-Done-Rockefeller-Evangelism/dp/0060927232/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1281302656&sr=1-1 to understand the relationship between such movements and mineral/resource rich regions.
We also know that the Maino-Gandhi clan has not condemned Maoist activity in the country. While direct missionary activity such as Gladys Steines and others get visible and evident support, hidden and violent missionary activity like the Maoists gets covert support through – no condemnation of such movements, support to intellectuals and journalists who are overground supporters of these movements and incapacitation of security efforts to curtail the violence. The connection of this potent combine of Maoist-Missionaries to mineral and resource regions is the magic equation.
Needless to say, several questions arise around this disappearance. Who was Raul Gandhi meeting? Why could the meeting not take place in front of all his countrypeople? Was this meeting in India’s interest? Could this meeting have to do with the mining mafia?
Priyanka Vadra’s visit to Nalini – LTTE Assassin (2008)
http://www.rediff.com/news/2008/may/02flip.htm
It is a bit strange that Rajiv Gandhi’s daughter received permission to do precisely what her great-grandfather had denied to the Mahatma’s flesh and blood, but we live in a very different age from the India of sixty years ago. I suppose both Dr Manmohan Singh and Thiru Karunanidhi thought that Priyanka Vadra could hold her own.
It is also a matter of record that the Nehru-Gandhi family made its peace with Nalini Sriharan long ago. The last surviving member of the assassination squad, Nalini Sriharan was actually sentenced to death; as I remember, a plea of clemency from Sonia Gandhi herself was instrumental in commutation of that sentence.
http://www.asiantribune.com/node/10664
http://www.boloji.com/myword/mwna019.htm
Will we ever know?
Sonia and Raul’s visits to China (2007, 2008)
http://www.rediff.com/news/2007/oct/29china.htm
Congress president Sonia Gandhi on Monday wound up her visit to China, becoming the first world leader to meet the newly-elected Chinese leadership and renewing Sino-Indian friendship, which her late husband, Rajiv, had given an impetus 19 years ago.
http://www.indianexpress.com/news/olympics-sonia-to-go-to-china-may-meet-com/343889/
While these were more public visits, the buzz is that a number of deals involving ores (to the detriment of India but beneficial to Swiss bank accounts) were inked. Additionally, there may have been informal dialogue related to Indian borders.
Sonia’s visits to Russia (2005) – likely more than one
http://mediavigil.blogspot.com/2005/08/ngo-watch.html
The invitation of President Vladimir Putin. Accusations were made about how she breached the protocol and how an executive plane of a big business house was used to fly her to Moscow. Objections were raised about Minister, Dr. Manmohan Singh, seeing her off at the airport and the External Affairs Minister, Natwar Singh, accompanying her to Russia
Sonia Gandhi’s four-day visit, organized by the Dialogue of Civilizations, a non-governmental group (What is this group?).
Sonia is in Russia as a personal guest of President Vladimir Putin.
Putin expressed satisfaction at the ongoing cooperation between India and Russia in all spheres of human activity, including defense.
Paola Maino’s visit to Anton Balasingham (2004)
Now as with most things in India, this visit was never made public so we have to rely on blogs to provide us with information
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/akandabaratam/message/49316?l=1
http://www.lankalibrary.com/phpBB/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=2955
http://www.newsanalysisindia.com/129042007.htm
http://www.angelfire.com/in/jalnews/2001/13041.htm
This (these) visits to LTTE head honchos are really curious given that LTTE did away with Paola Maino’s son-in-law. You will also see Quattrocchi’s name come up again and again in the context of the LTTE. Paola Maino and arms in an interesting cross-reference you will see again and again.
Raul’s visit and trouble in US/ Logan (2001)
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090415202855AAFtfbF
http://satyameva-jayate.org/2007/11/15/rahul-gandhi-boston-2001/
The story goes that Raul was apprehended at Boston’s Logan airport due to possession of $200,000 in cash which is apparently illegal. He was with his girlfriend/whatever else Juanita (whose uncle is a big drug and arms dealer, you will notice a pattern in the type of company the Maino-Gandhi clan keeps).
Brajesh Mishra came to the rescue and all was made hunky dory. Obviously, this news never made it to Indian mainstream media. One would be very interested in knowing what else Raul Gandhi had in his possession that required top level Indian Govt. intervention. One also worries that this knowledge could be used as a stick by foreign governments to control Maino-Gandhi clan.
Conclusion
It is impossible to connect the dots with the list above. We probably need access to 1000’s of dots more which ordinary people like us will not have access to.
What is evident is that while “Nehru was an egotistical, bumbling sepoy (much to India’s detriment), Indira Gandhi a cruel dictator and mixed bag, Rajiv Gandhi a greedy, bumbling idiot, the additional of the Maino gene to the Gandhi clan has mutated it into something truly ominous for India.
If you have additional data points please add them to the comments section.
Like
One blogger likes this post.

Tagged: Colonialism, Congress, Gandhi, Imperialism, India, Indian Politics
Posted in: Colonialism, Indias Liberalization – Boon or Curse, Politics
← My Response to a Christian BloggerVAac Yoga – Yoga of Sound – Part 2: Representation of AUM →
5 Responses “The Strange Visits of the Maino-Gandhi Clan” →

Shailesh Pandey
October 26, 2010
It is so obvious that this family has NOT a thing for our nation… but still a sizable chunk of political class are hell bent on retaining them in the top echelons of power … Misfortune is too small a word to describe what has befallen our nation in the form of these foreign IMPLANT’s … I get visions of vultures eating away at the very wounded body of a human(our nation) … U should write more ….
nice one
Reply

Esoteric
June 18, 2011
The Maino’s ‘now’ are a part of the Global Elite,the same elite trying to create allegedly a NWO etc.The situation is similar to the US and even UK.Here the Govt is in power but big corporates and families actually exercise the power.
On these tables, ‘size’ of deal matters.China in late 70s brought to the table (with Kissengers help) a big stake in that country for the West and in return China agreed to ‘open’ its economy.Maino’s ie Sonia is #9 on the most powerful persons in the world,according to Forbes.
Given this context,India for them is a resource to be milked.Everything is up for sale.Everyone is up for sale.In India,this leakage of funds in the form of black money is a trojan horse to control the elites.Sadly,most of them fall for the lure and the apologist propaganda.
In this equation,the key man is MMS.He is the one who can exercise the power that he has vested in him by law and act against them.Given,his RBI stint when he allowed BCCI(erstwile Pakistani bank) to operate in India despite its shady corporate structure amongst other things might be the ‘failure’ used to control him.Ofcourse,once you reach a certain level in Govt of India it was well known that US companies,embassy etc will try to influence policy in return for upto 25 Lacs in foreign postings etc for the Babu/employee in early 90s.This right tilt was necessitated due to collapse of USSR & our own bankruptcy.
Its anybodys guess as to how many politicians are ‘clean’.Everyone has been compromised in some way.Some good ones too,who want to be on the anti-corruption side cannot be.That leaves alone the one’s who are fighting the anti-corruption battle.No wonder,force was used at Ramlila Grounds.Allowing this campaign to succeed will not only put Kalmadis in jail..but also threaten/uncover the Fennel/Hoopers of the world.
But the momemtum is with the crusadors given the economic collapse,given that another is round the corner.With less money,elites will have less power and start fighting/devoruing each other.
Reply

Shreedhar
August 3, 2011
She is part of bilderbergs. And, out to save them using our wealth. Beware.
Reply
2 Trackbacks For This Post
Tweets that mention The Strange Visits of the Maino-Gandhi Clan « Nishkamya’s Blog — Topsy.com →
August 8th, 2010 → 11:59 pm
[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Ragu, Nishka Krishna. Nishka Krishna said: Blogpost: The strange visits of the Maino-Gandhi clan http://is.gd/e9g3l [...]
The Strange Visits of the Maino-Gandhi Clan (via Nishkamya’s Blog) « Hindu Internet Defence Force →
June 13th, 2011 → 4:58 pm
[...] This is just a smattering of visits that have been widely discussed. Visits when Rajiv Gandhi was PM are not included. I am certain that this is just the tip of the iceberg. I leave you to draw your own conclusions. Sonia & Raul’s visit to the US (2010) http://politicsparty.com/sonia_syndrome.php http://www.indianexpress.com/news/her-mother-ill-sonia-flies-to-us-with-rahul/653776/ This was a most bizarre visit with Sonia and Raul MIA for bot … Read More [...]

http://nishkamya.wordpress.com/2010/08/08/the-strange-visits-of-the-maino-gandhi-clan/

Jagan Mohan Reddy, Bharatmatha wants you to spill the beans on Sonia!

@Swamy39 : sir, wats ur view abt jagan mohan reddy’s arrest. i feel cbi(congress investigation department) trying to convict him as culprit


@HariPar1 : He should disclose what he and his family know about Sonia.

SoniaG blamed for Jagan arrest. Doubts about helicopter crash which killed YSR – YS Vijayamma

Jagan’s mother hits out at Sonia Gandhi for arrest

Andhra Pradesh,Politics, Sun, 27 May 2012IANS

Hyderabad, May 27 (IANS) Late Andhra Pradesh chief minister Y.S. Rajasekhara Reddy’s widow Y.S. Vijayamma Sunday blamed Congress president Sonia Gandhi for the arrest of her son Y.S. Jaganmohan Reddy.

Vijayamma, who along with other family members, called on Jagan at Dilkusha Guest House Sunday night, told reporters that Gandhi was targeting Jagan for going ahead with his “Odarpu Yatra” following YSR’s death in a helicopter crash in September 2009.
“What crime has my son committed? What do they want to do with my son,” asked Vijayamma in a voice choked with emotion. She along with her family members sat on the road outside the guest house to protest the arrest.

“Is this the reward to my late husband for giving 35 Lok Sabha seats and bringing Congress party to power at the centre,” asked Vijayamma, who is the honorary president of YSR Congress Party, floated by Jagan last year following their resignation from Congress.

YSR’s widow also voiced her doubts over the cause of helicopter crash that killed her husband.

She said Jagan was being targeted just because he defied Sonia Gandhi and went ahead with “Odarpu Yatra” to console the family members of those who committed suicide or died of shock following YSR’s death.

“I ask Sonia Gandhi is it is wrong to be public life. Are we living in a democratic country.”

She alleged that unable to digest the huge public support Jagan is getting, the Congress party got him arrested a few days before the June 12 by-elections to one Lok Sabha and 18 assembly seats.

Vijayamma, who is a member of state assembly, said people would decide the future of Jagan.

She alleged that the CBI arrested Jagan without any evidence and despite the fact that he was cooperating.

http://www.newstrackindia.com/newsdetails/2012/05/27/267–Jagan-s-mother-hits-out-at-Sonia-Gandhi-for-arrest-.html

Should have included Sonia Gandhi in the list, Subramaniam Swamy to Team Anna

Pune , Sun, 27 May 2012

ANI

Pune, May 27 (ANI): Team Anna should have included Congress chief Sonia Gandhi in their list of tainted ministers, 2-G scam petitioner Subramanian Swamy said on Sunday.

Swamy claimed that since Sonia Gandhi’s permission was taken on every important government decision, Hazare aides should have included her name in the list.

“Why did they leave out Sonia Gandhi? Nothing happens without Sonia Gandhi’s permission. She has got a cabinet rank as chairman of the National Advisory Council (NAC). Her opinion is taken on every issue,” Swamy told reporters here.

Further, he said Team Anna should have approached the police and filed a First Information Report (FIR) against the listed ministers.

“Documents are not new. It had been better if Anna Hazare and his aides would have approached a police station and registered a FIR and demanded investigation,” Swamy added.

Hazare aides have sought probe by a Special Investigation Team (SIT), consisting of former judges, within six months against 15 cabinet ministers including Prime Minister Manmohan Singh till July 24. (ANI)

http://www.newstrackindia.com/newsdetails/2012/05/27/289-Should-have-included-Sonia-Gandhi-in-the-list-Subramaniam-Swamy-to-Team-Anna.html

World’s #9 Most Powerful Person Now Accused of Corruption — Will She Fall?

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/cleo-paskal/worlds-9-most-powerful-pe_b_853132.html

New Delhi. Some of India’s biggest fish are getting caught up in the country’s fast-growing wave of anti-corruption activity. In what could be India’s equivalent of a judicial jasmine revolution, previously invulnerable politicians, business icons, and pillars of the community are all nervously keeping their lawyers on speed-dial.

The anti-corruption push is an unprecedented coming together of myriad facets of Indian society. Religious leaders are concerned about the effects on morality and spiritual growth. NGOs speak of the effects on the poor. The middle class is angry about its future being stifled by a smothering blanket of day-to-day corruption. The intelligence services see corruption a clear threat to national security. And the business community, thanks to globalization, has seen how efficiently things can operate without having to constantly pay bribes or be tangled in red tape, and they want the same thing at home.

Even the Supreme Court is fed up, with Justice B. Sudarshan Reddy saying about the vast sums of Indian money being illegally hidden away in Liechtenstein Bank:

We are talking about the huge money. It is a plunder of the nation. It is a pure and simple theft of the national money. We are talking about mind-boggling crime.

The scandals are bursting on to the front pages fast and thick. Suresh Kalmadi, a Congress Party politician and the former head of the corruption-plagued Commonwealth Games, was arrested April 25. According to a report by the Indian Comptroller and Auditor General, the 2G spectrum scam alone, in which 2G licenses were sold off in a manner that was, to say the least, less than transparent, cost close to $40 billion in lost revenue.

All across India, people are saying enough is enough. And suddenly the unthinkable is starting to happen. People considered above reproach, or at least untouchable, are coming under the judicial cross-hairs. 2G alone has seen charges laid against one former government minister and several captains of industry.

And the latest high profile target is one of the biggest fish of all, Congress Party President Sonia Gandhi, currently #9 on Forbes list of the World’s Most Powerful People.

Sonia Gandhi has one of the most remarkable life stories in international politics. Born Edvige Antonia Albina Maino into a family of modest means in rural Italy, she didn’t even get a chance to complete high school before heading to the UK for work. There she met Rajiv Gandhi, son of Indian Prime Minister Indira Gandhi. She eventually married him and the young family moved in to Indira Gandhi’s New Delhi’s home, putting her literally in the heart of Indian politics.

After Indira Gandhi’s assassination in 1984, Sonia’s husband Rajiv became Prime Minister. Following Rajiv’s 1991 assassination by Tamil terrorists, there were rumors that Sonia was going to put herself forward as Prime Minister.

As she herself later said, she “could not walk past the portraits of my husband, my mother-in-law and her father and not feel that I had some responsibility to try and save the party they had given their lives to.”

2011-04-25-SoniaCongress.jpg

Given her focus on the party, it was fitting that instead of becoming Prime Minister, she ended up as President of the powerful Congress Party. Politically, it proved to be a smart move as it gave her power without direct responsibility — while she is #9 on Forbes list of power people, the actual Prime Minister of India, Manmohan Singh, is only #18. According to Forbes, “Gandhi remains the real power behind the nuclear-tipped throne [...] she has cemented her status as true heiress to the Nehru-Gandhi political dynasty.”

Her image is of a dutiful, submissive Indian wife, now widow. When her husband was alive, she would walk behind him. In public she wears saris. Although a devout Catholic, she is often photographed at Hindu Temples. And like a good Indian mother, though she has decorously pulled herself out of the race for Prime Minister, she is happy to encourage her son, Rahul, to take the job.

However there have been growing, persistent murmurs about questionable business deals and inexplicable exponential jumps in the personal wealth of her and her family.

The allegations came out in the open in 1995 when M. D. Nalapat, then Resident Editor (Delhi) of the world’s largest English language newspaper, the Times of India, began a groundbreaking series of articles about Sonia.

The articles made the controversial (at the time) claim that the public docility was just a ploy, and that Sonia actually had serious political ambitions (later confirmed by her role in Congress). Also, crucially, the series said that her desire for power wasn’t simply altruistic and that the wealth not only of her, but of her Italian relatives, rose stratospherically after Rajiv Gandhi became Prime Minister in 1984.

Nalapat’s articles could not be ignored as he was one of India’s most respected journalists and had, throughout his career, taken on corrupt politicians, social inequity and institutionalized discrimination.

This however was a ‘topic too far’. While the facts in the article were never refuted, Nalapat was forced out of journalism in 1998 and moved into academics.

Next came public questions from another highly reputed source, Sten Lindstrom, Sweden’s special prosecutor investigating the pay-offs associated with the sale of weapons by Bofors to the government of India. His investigation showed that a close friend of Sonia’s, Ottavio Quattrocchi, has received kickbacks in the millions.

In 1998 Lindstrom gave an interview in which he said:

the Gandhis, particularly now Sonia, should explain how Quattrocchi-owned companies got such fat sums as payoffs from the Bofors deal. After all, what is the connection of Sonia and the Gandhi family to Quattrocchi? Who introduced Quattrocchi and his AE Services to Bofors? At least one thing is certainly known now. A part of the payoffs definitely went to Quattrocchi. [...] the papers all pointed to the Gandhi family.

Not only have the questions not been answered by Sonia, but in spite of substantial evidence against him, Quattrocchi has managed to evade prosecution in India, and has even had his kickback funds unfrozen from overseas accounts.

Part of the genius of Sonia Gandhi is her ability to present herself as a helpless victim, convincing even her political rivals not to fear her as she is fatally flawed. In 1998, India was being led by BJP Prime Minister Vajpayee. When Nalapat spoke with him about Sonia, he was bluntly told to lay off, as, “so long as a white Christian lady is head of the Congress Party, I [Vajpayee] and my party will always be in power”. Vajpayee and his party lost power to Sonia’s Congress in 2004.

But the most serious threat to Sonia — and, as she is at the apex of the Congress Party, and so to Congress itself — is now lying on the desk of #18, the Prime Minister of India.

On April 15, former Law and Justice Minister and Harvard Professor Dr. Subramanian Swamy asked Prime Minister Manmohan Singh for leave to lay corruption charges against Sonia Gandhi. In a meticulously researched 200+ page submission Dr Swamy alleges Sonia Gandhi has been involved in corruption in India since 1972 and personally benefited from the Bofors scam (1986), has held billions in non-Indian bank accounts since at least 1991, illegally profited from the Iraqi oil-for-food deals (2002), and even accessed KGB payoffs during the Cold War.

The Prime Minister has three months to decide whether or not to grant sanction to prosecute. If he doesn’t, Dr. Swamy can take the case directly to the Supreme Court, which under Chief Justice Kapadia is showing a definite proclivity towards facilitating corruption cases.

While, so far, the corruption cases in India have caught up some pretty big fish, if charges are laid against Sonia Gandhi, it won’t just be part of a wave, it will be a sea change.

Sonia Gandhi is not just an individual, she is the steely core of a pillar of Indian politics. If she crumbles, it will shake the foundations of the venerable Congress Party, and possibly leave a gaping hole in the political scene. Meanwhile, a range of polarizing and regional parties are ready to rush in and stake their claim. Given the growing importance of India in our heavily globalized world, this is not just an Indian story, this is one all should be following very closely indeed.

LIC money: Is it for investors’ benefit, or Rahul’s election?

By Vivek Kaul

“We’re slowly learning that fact. And we’re very, very pissed off.” 
—Lines from the movie Fight Club

The government’s piggybank is in trouble. Well, not major trouble. But, yes, some trouble.

Global credit rating agency Moody’s downgraded the Life Insurance Corporation (LIC) of India from a Baa2 rating to Baa3 rating. This is the lowest investment grade rating given by Moody’s.  The top 10 ratings given by Moody’s fall in the investment grade category.

Moody’s downgraded LIC on Monday due to three reasons: a) for picking up stake in the divestment of stocks like ONGC, when no one else was willing, to help the government reduce its fiscal deficit; b) for picking up stakes in a lot of public sector banks; c) for having excessive exposure to bonds issued by the government of India to finance its fiscal deficit.

While the downgrade will have no impact on the way India’s largest insurer operates within India, it does raise a few basic issues which need to be discussed threadbare.

Hoping for the South Block office. PTI

From Africa with Love: The wives of certain African dictators before going on a shopping trip to Europe used to visit the central bank of their country in order to stuff their wallets with dollars. The African dictators and their extended families used the money lying with the central banks of their countries as their personal piggybank. Whenever they required money they used to simply dip into the reserves at the central bank.

While the government of India has not fallen to a similar level there is no doubt that it treats LIC like a piggybank, rushing to it whenever it needs the money.

So why does the government use LIC as its piggybank? The answer is very simple. It spends more than what it earns. The difference between what the government earns and what it spends is referred to as the fiscal deficit.

In the year 2007-2008 (i.e. between 1 April 2007 and 31 March 2008) the fiscal deficit of the government of India stood at Rs 1,26,912 crore. For the year 2011-2012 (i.e. between 1 April 2011 and 31 March 2012) the fiscal deficit is expected to be Rs 5,21,980 crore.

Hence the fiscal deficit has increased by a whopping 312 percent between 2007 and 2012. During the same period the income earned by the government has gone up by only 36 percent to Rs 7,96,740 crore. The expenses of the government have risen more than eight-and-a-half times faster than its revenues.

What is interesting is that the fiscal deficit numbers would have been much higher had the government not got LIC to buy shares of public sector companies it was selling to bring down the fiscal deficit.

Estimates made by the Business Standard Research Bureau in early March showed that LIC had invested around Rs 12,400 crore out of the total Rs 45,000 crore that the government had collected through the divestment of shares in seven public sector units since 2009. The value of these shares in March was around Rs 9,379 crore. Since early March the BSE Sensex has fallen 7.4 percent, which means that the LIC investment would have lost further value.

Over and above this the government also forced LIC to pick up 90 percent of the 5 percent follow-on offer from ONGC in early March this year.  This after the stock market did not show any interest in buying the shares of the oil major.  The money raised through this divestment of shares went towards lowering the fiscal deficit of the government of India.

News reports also suggest that LIC was buying shares of ONGC in the months before the public issue of the insurance major hit the stock market, in an effort to bid up its price. Between December and March before the public offer, the government first got LIC to buy shares of ONGC and bid up the price of the stock from around Rs 260 in late December to Rs 293 by the end of February. After LIC had bid up the price of ONGC, the government then asked it to buy 90 percent of the shares on sale in the follow on public offer.

This is a unique investment philosophy where an institutional investor managing money for the small retail investor first bid up the price of the stock by buying small chunks of it, and then bought a large chunk at a higher price. Stock market gurus keep repeating the investment philosophy of “buy-low-sell high” to make money in the stock market. The government likes LIC to follow precisely the opposite investment philosophy of “buying high”.

Estimates made by Business Standard suggest that LIC in total bought ONGC shares worth Rs 15,000 crore. The stock is since down more than 10 percent.

The bank bang: LIC again came to the rescue of a cash-starved government during the first three months of this year, when it was forced to buy shares of several government-owned banks which needed more capital.  It is now sitting on losses from these investments.

Take the case of Vijaya Bank. It issued shares to LIC at a price of Rs 64.27 per share. Since then the price of the stock has fallen nearly 19 percent.

The same is with Dena Bank. The stock price is down by almost 10 percent since allocation of shares to LIC. The share price of Indian Overseas Bank is down by almost 19.7 percent since it sold shares to LIC to boost its equity capital. While the broader stock market has also fallen during the period it hasn’t fallen as much as the stock prices of these shares have.

There are more than a few issues that crop up here. This special allotment of shares to LIC to raise capital has pushed up the ownership of LIC in many banks beyond the 10 percent mandated by the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India, the insurance regulator. As any investment professional will tell you that having excessive exposure to one particular company or sector isn’t a good strategy, especially when managing money for the retail investor, which is what LIC primarily does. What is interesting is that the government is breaking its own laws and thus not setting a great precedent for the private sector.

If LIC hadn’t picked up the shares of these banks, the fiscal deficit of the government would have gone up further.

The third issue here is why should the government run so many banks? The government of India runs 26 banks (20 public sector banks plus the State Bank of India and its five subsidiaries).

While banking is a sensitive sector and some government presence is required, that doesn’t mean that the government has to run 26 banks. It is time to privatise some of these banks.

Gentlemen prefer bonds: As of 31 December 2011, the ratio of government securities to adjusted shareholders’ equity in LIC was 764 percent. This is understandable given that the subsidy-heavy budget of the Congress-led UPA government has seen its fiscal deficit balloon by 312 percent over the last five years. Again, basic investment philosophy tells us that having a large exposure to one investment isn’t really a great idea, even if it’s a government.

The Rahul factor: But the most basic issue here is the fact that the government is using the small savings of the average Indian who buys LIC policies to make loss-making investments. This is simply not done.

LIC has turned into the behemoth it has become over the years by offering high commissions to its agents over the years. It sells very little of “term insurance”, the real insurance. What it basically sells are investment policies with very high expenses which are used to pay high commissions to it’s the agents. The high commissions in turn ensure that these agents continue to hard-sell LIC’s extremely high-cost investment policies to normal gullible Indians.

The premium keeps coming in and the government keeps using LIC as a piggybank.

The high front-loading of commissions is allowed by The Insurance Act, 1938. The commission for the first year can be a maximum of 40 percent of the premium. In years two and three, the caps are 7.5 per cent, and 5 per cent thereafter. These are the maximum caps and serve as a ceiling rather than a floor.

The Committee on Investor Protection and Awareness led by D Swarup, the then Chairman of the Pension Fund Regulatory and Development Authority,  had proposed in September 2009 to do away with commissions across financial products. “All retail financial products should go no-load by April 2011,” the committee had proposed in its reports.

The National Pension Scheme (NPS) was already on a no-commission structure. And so were mutual funds since 1 August 2009. But LIC and the other insurance companies were allowed to pay high commissions to their agents. “Because there are almost three million small agents who will have to adjust to a new way of earning money, it is suggested that immediately the upfront commissions embedded in the premium paid be cut to no more than 15 percent of the premium. This should fall to 7 percent in 2010 and become nil by April 2011,” the committee had further proposed.

Not surprisingly the government quietly buried this groundbreaking report.

While insurance commissions have come down on unit-linked insurance plans, the traditional insurance policies in which LIC remains a market leader continue to pay high commissions to their agents.  These traditional insurance policies typically invest in debt (read government bonds which are issued to finance the fiscal deficit).

This is primarily because the Congress-led UPA government needs the premium collected by LIC to run LIC like a piggybank. The piggybank money can and is being used to run subsidies in the hope that the beneficiaries vote for Rahul Gandhi in 2014.

Is the objective of LIC to generate returns and ensure the safety of the hard-earned money of crores of it’s investors? Or is it to let the UPA government run it like a piggybank in the hope that Rahul baba becomes the Prime Minister?

The country is waiting for an answer.

(Vivek Kaul is a writer and can be reached at vivek.kaul@gmail.com)

http://www.firstpost.com/politics/lic-money-is-it-for-investors-benefit-or-rahul-election-309545.html

Sonia Gandhi’s name may be incorporated in the 84 riots petition before US Court – Sikhs for Justice

Sonia Gandhi’s name may be incorporated in the 84 riots petition before US Court

JPJI Correspondent: May 12, 2012


The Sikh Advocacy group Sikhs For Justice SFJ is seriously considering to amend its petition before the
US Court to incorporate Congress party chief Sonia Gandhi’s name to ensure legal validity of delivery of summons to the head of Congress – named in thepetition as the prime accused in the anti-Sikh riots of 1984.

This move on the part of SFJ was necessitated as Congress was taking the defence that a political party cannot be sued under Alien Tort Claims Act.

The Congress, which has been named in a case inNew Yorkfor its alleged role in the 1984 anti-Sikh riots inIndia, has challenged the jurisdiction of aUScourt to hear the matter filed against it by a Sikh advocacy group.

According to Jones Day attorneys, service of summons on the Congress party through Hague Convention is flawed because the party’s headquarters inNew Delhidid not receive the summons and complaint. They added that serving summons last year on Surinder Malhotra, president of the Indian National Overseas Congress (INOC) here, is inappropriate as the Congress has no relationship with INOC and Malhotra is not authorised to act on behalf of the party.

To this, SFJ’s lawyers said they have submitted evidence to the US court showing that summons and complaint was delivered in March, 2011, to the central authority in Delhi— established by the Indian government for receiving and serving judicial documents from foreign court as required by the Hague Service Convention of 1965. Under Article 15 of the Hague Convention on Service Abroad, which has been signed byIndiaandUnited States, service is
considered complete once copy of summons and complaint is delivered to the Central Authority.

They also presented evidence showing that after receipt and acknowledgement of summons in March 2011, the Congress had taken a series of legal actions to defend against the claims of human rights violations.
Sikhs for Justice, along with victims of the Sikh riots, had filed a complaint in March 2011 under Alien Tort Claims Act and Torture Victim Protection Act against the Congress for conspiring, aiding, abetting, organising and carrying out attacks on the Sikh population in November 1984.

On Wednesday, federal court Judge Robert Sweet heard oral arguments in the case filed by Sikhs For Justice (SFJ) on the issues of service, jurisdiction and the Congress’ failure to respond to the summons in the case. Sweet said the Congress has not filed any defence on the merits of the allegations of conspiring, aiding, abetting, organising and carrying out the attacks on Sikhs in November 1984. The party, however, has challenged theUScourt’s jurisdiction to hear the case of 1984 Sikh genocide.

Attorneys from the law firm Jones Day, representing the Congress, argued that under the Alien Tort Claims Act, a “corporation” cannot be sued for humanAttorneys from the law firm Jones Day, representing the Congress, argued that under the Alien Tort Claims Act, a “corporation” cannot be sued for human rights violations by its members. Lawyers for the victims, on the other hand, argued that there is difference between the status of a “corporation” and “political organisation”.

http://jagopunjabjagoindia.com/sonia-gandhis-name-may-be-incorporated-in-the-84-riots-petition-before-us-court-5776

!! Italian Minister in India !!

Thanks for the story from our reader Group Captain Rajagopal.

Italian Minister in India !!    S.M.Krishna was trying to tell the Italian Minister who came to rescue the sailors, why it is better to have the trial in India. He was trying to impress the minister by elaborating the general hospitality and love that Sonia have got towards criminals. He started with the story of Union Carbide, arms dealer Quottorchi, and how we treat the hero Kasab, etc.  Then a man in Dhoti was passing through the corridor. Krishna said we are protecting him also. The Italian Minister looked at the guy and asked who he was. Kirshna replied:That is Chidambaram our Finance Minister. The Italian repeated: Cheat Ambaram? I have heard his name. Wasn’t he your Finance Minister? Of course you should protect him. Krishna smiled and said: you have no idea my friend.  Then he told him the story of the Spectrum scandal and about Raja, Kanimozhi, and showed him the list of black money account holders from the Swiss bank and explained to him how well protected are all  these people in India.  The Italian Minister could not resist expressing the appreciation. When he came out of the room, he heard about the verdict of the Kerala Judge to release the ship on a bail of 25 lakhs. Lakhs? What is this? How much is this in Euro? Approx. 38,000. He ran back to Krishna’s room and begged him to have the trial in India. Then he asked for more details about Raja and spectrum.  Highly impressed, he asked whether he can get an Indian Citizenship. Krishna suggested he should get married to a Nehru family member. The minister was confused as the only available one is Rahul. Krishna winked at him and said, my friend, Congress can find a way if you are really interested in the alliance. Then he said to the Italian, now I am going to the press and pretend that I am tough on you. But just ignore it. The Italian Minister made a few phone calls, the first one to Rome and said he is not coming back. Then he made another call to Sicily and talked to the Mafia Chief: You fool your operating methods are so primitive. Come to India and learn how they do it with the most modern techniques.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.